Mr. Altig’s Overview of the Wonderful Dharma of the Lotus Sutra

Introduction

Purpose: This report provides an expert-level analysis of a significant passage attributed to Nichiren Daishonin (1222–1282) from his work, the Treatise on The Four Depths of Faith and Five Stages of Practice (Shishin Gohon-Shō). The analysis aims to elucidate the passage’s meaning, explore its doctrinal underpinnings within the broader context of Nichiren Buddhism, examine its philosophical interpretations, place it within a comparative Buddhist framework, and synthesize its overall message regarding religious practice.

The Passage: The text central to this examination reads as follows:

“Muddy water has no mind but it still catches the moon’s reflection and naturally becomes lucid. Plants and trees catch the rain in order to blossom, but can we say they do this deliberately? The five characters of Myo Ho Ren Ge Kyo are not the text of the sutra nor a mere explanation; rather they are the sole intent of the whole sutra. Beginners may practice this without knowing the heart (of the Lotus Sutra), but their practice will naturally harmonize with its intention. Nichiren wrote this passage in his Treatise on The Four Depths of Faith and Five Stages of Practice (Shishin Gohon-Shō). This is another way of saying that we do not need to rely on our own skills or wisdom to practice the Buddha Dharma. Whether we are brilliant or slow, focused or distracted, calm or agitated, when we rely on the Ever-Present Buddha, we are in harmony with the world.”

Significance: This passage serves as a concise yet profound articulation of several core tenets central to Nichiren Buddhism. It highlights the radical accessibility of Buddhist practice, emphasizing the primacy of faith over intellectual understanding, particularly within the context of the Latter Day of the Law (Mappō). Furthermore, it underscores the unique status attributed to the phrase Nam Myoho Renge Kyo as the very essence of the Lotus Sutra, and points towards the fundamental Mahayana doctrine of inherent Buddhahood, suggesting a natural mechanism through which practice aligns individuals with ultimate reality.

Methodology: The analysis presented herein draws upon Nichiren Daishonin’s collected writings (known as the Gosho), scholarly interpretations of Nichiren Buddhism, and a contextual understanding derived from the provided research materials. The focus remains on unpacking the layers of meaning embedded within the passage and relating them to the broader doctrinal and philosophical landscape of Nichiren’s teachings.

Roadmap: This report will systematically address the key themes presented in the passage, following a structure designed to explore:

1. The life of Nichiren Daishonin and the historical and doctrinal context surrounding the Shishin Gohon-Shō.
2. The foundational role of the Lotus Sutra in Nichiren’s thought.
3. The meaning and significance of Myo Ho Ren Ge Kyo (Nam Myoho Renge Kyo) as the sutra’s essence.
4. Philosophical interpretations of the analogies of the muddy water and the plants receiving rain.
5. The concept of the “Ever-Present Buddha” and reliance on inherent Buddhahood.
6. The relationship between Nichiren Buddhist practice and achieving harmony, irrespective of practitioner capacity.
7. A comparative perspective on the emphasis on faith and practice versus intellectual understanding in other Buddhist schools.
8. A synthesis of the overall message concerning the universal accessibility and efficacy of Nichiren Buddhist practice.

I. Nichiren Daishonin and the Context of the Treatise

A. Nichiren’s Life and Mission in the Latter Day of the Law (Mappō)

Understanding the passage from the Shishin Gohon-Shō necessitates appreciating the historical and intellectual milieu of its author, Nichiren Daishonin. His life and teachings were profoundly shaped by the conditions of thirteenth-century Kamakura Japan, a period marked by significant social upheaval, political conflict, natural disasters, and a pervasive sense of eschatological anxiety centered on the Buddhist concept of Mappō, the Latter Day or Final Dharma age.¹ This era was widely believed to be one of decline, where the Buddha’s teachings would lose their efficacy.¹

Nichiren began his Buddhist studies at age 11 at Seichō-ji, a temple of the Tendai school, eventually taking the name Zeshō-bō Renchō upon ordination.² His Tendai background provided him with a deep reverence for the Lotus Sutra, which the school held as the supreme teaching.³ However, witnessing the suffering and turmoil around him, Nichiren embarked on a quest to understand why traditional Buddhist practices seemed unable to alleviate the nation’s distress and why protective deities appeared to have abandoned Japan.¹

His conclusion, radically different from his contemporaries, was that Japan had entered Mappō, rendering established Buddhist practices—such as the Nembutsu (chanting Amida Buddha’s name), Zen meditation, and esoteric Shingon rituals—ineffective.¹ Nichiren asserted with unwavering conviction that in this degenerate age, only exclusive devotion to the Lotus Sutra offered a path to liberation and societal peace.² He argued that the nation’s calamities were a direct result of the government and populace embracing “false” or inferior teachings and abandoning the true Dharma embodied in the Lotus Sutra.¹ This conviction was famously articulated in his 1260 treatise, Risshō Ankoku Ron (On Establishing the Correct Teaching for the Peace of the Land), presented as a remonstrance to the ruling authorities.⁵ In it, he argued that only by embracing the “true and correct form of Buddhism”—centered on the Lotus Sutra—could the nation achieve peace and prosperity (ankoku).²

Paradoxically, Nichiren viewed Mappō not just as an age of decline but as the opportune moment for the propagation of the ultimate teaching by the Bodhisattvas of the Earth, figures prophesied in the Lotus Sutra.¹ His unwavering propagation of this exclusive message, however, brought him into direct conflict with the authorities and established religious sects, leading to numerous persecutions, including two exiles (to Izu and later Sado Island) and a failed execution attempt.² Nichiren interpreted these hardships as proof of his legitimacy as the Votary of the Lotus Sutra, fulfilling prophecies within the sutra itself about the persecution its practitioners would face.⁹ His exile on Sado Island (1271-1274) proved particularly significant, as it was during this period that he wrote some of his most important doctrinal works, including the Kaimoku Shō (The Opening of the Eyes) and the Kanjin no Honzon Shō (The Object of Devotion for Observing the Mind), and inscribed the first Gohonzon mandala.²

The intense focus on Mappō and the perceived failures of other Buddhist schools directly shaped Nichiren’s insistence on the Lotus Sutra‘s exclusivity and the necessity of a simple, potent practice accessible to all, regardless of their innate capacity. Mappō doctrine posits the decline and inefficacy of prior teachings.¹ Observing the chaos of his time, Nichiren linked it directly to what he deemed ‘incorrect’ Buddhist practices supported by the state.¹ Consequently, he concluded that only the Lotus Sutra retained its power in this final age.³ Promoting the Lotus Sutra, primarily through the chanting of its title (Daimoku), thus became the sole viable solution for both individual salvation and national peace. This conviction necessitated the forceful refutation (shakubuku) of alternative paths, leading to his famous “Four Denunciations”.⁵ The Shishin Gohon-Shō then serves to doctrinally justify how this specific practice functions effectively for beings living in Mappō, particularly through its emphasis on faith over innate wisdom.¹¹ Nichiren’s personal experiences of persecution likely served only to deepen his conviction in this mission.

B. The Doctrinal Landscape: Tendai Influence and Critique of Contemporary Schools

Nichiren’s Buddhist framework emerged from a specific doctrinal context, heavily influenced by the Tendai school yet simultaneously defined by its sharp critique of contemporary Buddhist practices. His education at Seichō-ji immersed him in Tendai teachings, which already held the Lotus Sutra in the highest esteem.² Foundational Tendai concepts, such as ichinen sanzen (three thousand realms in a single moment of life), derived from the great Chinese Tiantai master Zhiyi, provided an intellectual basis for understanding the profound interconnectedness of reality and the inherent potential for Buddhahood within momentary experience.⁶ Nichiren adapted and utilized these concepts to explain the efficacy of chanting Daimoku.⁶

However, Nichiren’s assessment of Mappō led him to vehemently reject the practices of other prominent schools, consolidating his criticisms into what became known as the “Four Denunciations” ⁵:

1. Pure Land (Nembutsu): Nichiren condemned the widespread reliance on chanting Namu Amida Butsu (the Nembutsu) for rebirth in Amida’s Pure Land (Sukhavati). He argued this was a misguided hope, particularly in Mappō, asserting that such practices, based on provisional sutras, actually led practitioners to the hell of incessant suffering (Avici hell), not salvation.³ He saw the Pure Land focus on rebirth in another realm as contradicting the Lotus Sutra‘s promise of attaining Buddhahood in this present world and lifetime.¹⁰
2. Zen: He criticized Zen’s emphasis on meditation and direct experience independent of scriptural authority, labeling its claim of attaining enlightenment without relying on the Buddha’s words (specifically the Lotus Sutra) as “devilish”.⁵
3. Shingon (Esoteric Buddhism): Nichiren denounced Shingon practices and rituals as mere “magic” that, far from protecting the nation, would actually lead to its decay.⁵ He also later critiqued the Tendai school itself for incorporating Shingon elements.⁵
4. Ritsu (Precepts School): He dismissed the Ritsu school, which emphasized monastic discipline and precepts, as “thievery,” suggesting its focus on outward forms and public works masked a lack of true engagement with the ultimate Dharma.⁵

These denunciations stemmed from Nichiren’s core conviction in the exclusive validity of the Lotus Sutra for the age of Mappō.³ He advocated a method of propagation known as shakubuku, which involved forcefully refuting what he saw as erroneous doctrines to awaken people to the truth of the Lotus Sutra.⁵ While modern observers might critique this exclusivity as intolerant, proponents argue it must be understood within the context of Nichiren’s time and his profound sense of urgency regarding salvation in Mappō.⁵

An underlying tension exists between Nichiren’s intellectual roots in the complex doctrinal systems of Tendai Buddhism and his Mappō-driven simplification of practice, focusing almost exclusively on the chanting of Daimoku. While building upon Tendai frameworks like ichinen sanzen ³, he radically reoriented the practical application for the perceived needs of his time. Tendai tradition involved intricate classifications of teachings and sophisticated meditative practices, such as those outlined in Zhiyi’s Mohe Zhiguan (Great Concentration and Insight).¹⁴ Nichiren, however, particularly in texts like the Shishin Gohon-Shō, argued against the necessity of these complex approaches (precepts, meditation, deep wisdom) for beginners in the Latter Day of the Law.¹¹ He elevated the chanting of Daimoku—the title of the very Lotus Sutra revered by Tendai—to the status of the supreme and sufficient practice for attaining enlightenment.²⁷ This represents a significant simplification and a shift in emphasis, prioritizing faith and accessibility due to the perceived diminished capacity of people in Mappō, thereby creating a dynamic tension with the intellectual and practical complexity of his Tendai heritage.

C. The “Treatise on The Four Depths of Faith and Five Stages of Practice (Shishin Gohon-Shō)”: Purpose and Significance

The Shishin Gohon-Shō stands as one of Nichiren Daishonin’s major writings (Gosho).⁸ It is generally believed to have been composed around the fourth month of 1277, following Nichiren’s return from his Sado exile, as a detailed response to questions posed by his learned lay disciple, Toki Jōnin.²⁷ While acknowledging the general scholarly awareness of potential editorial alterations or authenticity questions surrounding some Gosho texts over the centuries ⁸, the Shishin Gohon-Shō holds a significant place in articulating key aspects of Nichiren’s practical doctrine. Its collection and preservation were part of the efforts by Nichiren’s immediate disciples, such as the six senior priests, to safeguard his teachings.²⁹

The treatise’s core subject is an exposition of the “four stages of faith” and “five stages of practice,” concepts derived by the Tiantai/Tendai school from the “Distinctions in Benefits” (Fumbetsu Kudoku) chapter of the Lotus Sutra.¹¹ These stages outline the progression of practitioners in relation to the Lotus Sutra. Nichiren utilizes this framework to establish what he considers the correct and essential practice for people living in the Latter Day of the Law.

The central argument of the Shishin Gohon-Shō is that for practitioners in Mappō, particularly those in the initial stages (corresponding to the first stage of faith, “producing even a single moment of belief and understanding,” and the first stage of practice, “rejoicing on hearing the Lotus Sutra”), the traditional Buddhist “three types of learning”—precepts (kai), meditation (jō), and wisdom (e)—are not the primary requirement.¹¹ Nichiren argues, based on his interpretation of the Lotus Sutra and Tiantai commentaries, that for these initial stages in Mappō, the Buddha emphasized wisdom alone. However, recognizing the perceived inadequacy of innate wisdom in this degenerate age, Nichiren posits that faith (shin) must substitute for wisdom, becoming the very foundation of practice.¹¹ Disbelief is identified as the root of slander and rebirth in hell, whereas faith becomes the direct cause for attaining Buddha wisdom.¹¹ Consequently, the treatise strongly advocates for the exclusive chanting of Nam Myoho Renge Kyo (Daimoku) as the sufficient practice, asserting that it inherently contains the merit of all other practices, including precepts and meditation, and leads directly to Buddhahood.¹¹

This treatise, therefore, provides the direct doctrinal context for the user-provided passage. It explains why Nichiren states that practitioners do not need to rely on their own skills or wisdom, why faith is paramount, and how the practice of chanting Daimoku, even without deep intellectual comprehension, can naturally harmonize the practitioner with the ultimate intent of the Lotus Sutra.¹¹

II. The Lotus Sutra: Foundation of Nichiren’s Teachings

A. Supremacy and Centrality in Mahayana and Nichiren Buddhism

The Saddharma Puṇḍarīka Sūtra, or Lotus Sutra, occupies a position of profound importance within the Mahayana Buddhist tradition and stands as the absolute cornerstone of Nichiren Daishonin’s teachings. Within the broader Mahayana context, it is revered as one of the most influential scriptures, venerated across East Asia (China, Korea, Japan) for centuries.⁴ Historical evidence points to its existence through Sanskrit manuscripts discovered in Nepal, Central Asia, and Kashmir, dating back possibly as early as the fifth or sixth century, with numerous translations into Chinese, Tibetan, and other East Asian languages facilitating its spread.⁴ The sutra aimed to broaden the accessibility of Buddhist practice, giving a more significant role to lay believers and presenting teachings in appealing narrative and poetic forms.³¹

For Nichiren, however, the Lotus Sutra was not merely one important text among many; it was the ultimate, supreme, and singular expression of Shakyamuni Buddha’s enlightenment.² He considered all teachings expounded by the Buddha in the forty-plus years prior to the Lotus Sutra to be provisional, skillful means (hōben) designed solely to prepare disciples for this final, definitive revelation.¹⁵ In the context of Mappō, Nichiren asserted that these provisional teachings had lost their salvific power, and only the Lotus Sutra retained the capacity to lead beings to liberation.³ He employed scriptural proof texts from the Lotus Sutra itself, which declares its own superiority (“among those sutras the Lotus is the foremost!”) ³⁵, and developed systematic criteria, known as the “Five Guides” (gogi)—considering the teaching’s quality, the people’s capacity, the time, the country, and the sequence of propagation—to doctrinally establish the Lotus Sutra‘s unique suitability for thirteenth-century Japan.¹ While acknowledging potential historical questions about whether the extant Lotus Sutra contains the literal words of the historical Buddha, Nichiren adhered to the traditional Mahayana explanation that such profound teachings were preserved and transmitted secretly until the appropriate time for their revelation arrived.³⁶

B. Core Tenets Relevant to Nichiren’s Interpretation

Several core doctrines within the Lotus Sutra are fundamental to understanding Nichiren’s specific interpretation and the passage under analysis:

1. Universal Buddhahood: Perhaps the most revolutionary teaching of the Lotus Sutra is its unequivocal declaration that all sentient beings possess Buddha-nature (busshō) and have the inherent potential to attain Buddhahood.⁴ This radically overturned previous Buddhist views that often excluded certain groups—such as women, individuals deemed inherently evil (icchantika), and practitioners of the so-called “two vehicles” (voice-hearers or śrāvakas and cause-awakened ones or pratyekabuddhas)—from the possibility of ultimate enlightenment.³³ The Lotus Sutra, particularly in its “Expedient Means” (Hōben) chapter, reveals the principle of the “true aspect of all phenomena” (shohō jissō), which posits that all phenomena, encompassing the Ten Worlds (from hell to Buddhahood), are ultimately manifestations of the Mystic Law (Myoho Renge Kyo) and thus inherently equal in their potential.³⁴ This doctrine forms the bedrock for Nichiren’s emphasis on the possibility of attaining Buddhahood in one’s present form (sokushin jōbutsu).
2. One Vehicle (Ekayāna): The Lotus Sutra introduces the concept of the “One Vehicle” or Ekayāna, asserting that the diverse paths and teachings previously taught by the Buddha (often categorized as the three vehicles for śrāvakas, pratyekabuddhas, and bodhisattvas) are ultimately skillful means (upāya) designed to lead all beings toward the single, supreme goal of Buddhahood.⁴ The famous parable of the burning house illustrates this: a father lures his children out of a burning house with promises of different carts (vehicles), but ultimately gives them all the same magnificent white ox cart (the One Vehicle).⁴⁰ While this doctrine can be interpreted inclusively, suggesting a reconciliation of various Buddhist paths, Nichiren, viewing it through the lens of Mappō, interpreted it exclusively. He argued that in the Latter Day, the “skillful means” of the provisional teachings had lost their efficacy, and thus the One Vehicle effectively meant that the Lotus Sutra itself, and the practice derived from it (chanting Daimoku), was the only remaining valid path to enlightenment.⁶ The urgency of Mappō transforms the potentially pluralistic Ekayana into a justification for Nichiren’s singular focus.
3. The Eternal Buddha (Original Buddha): A pivotal revelation occurs in the “Life Span of the Thus Come One” (Juryō) chapter (Chapter 16). Here, Shakyamuni discards his historical identity as a prince who attained enlightenment under the Bodhi tree in India, revealing that he had actually attained Buddhahood countless eons ago in the remote past (gohyaku jintengō).⁴ This Eternal Buddha is revealed as being ever-present, constantly abiding in this saha world (the world of suffering) to guide beings toward enlightenment.⁶ This profound concept of an immanent, eternal Buddhahood underpins the idea of the “Ever-Present Buddha” mentioned in the query passage. It signifies that the ultimate reality, the life-state of the Buddha, is not distant but eternally accessible.³⁴ This doctrine also provides the basis for the later veneration of Nichiren himself by some followers as the “Buddha of the Latter Day of the Law” or even the “True Buddha” (Honbutsu), seen as the manifestation of this eternal reality for the current age.⁵ Furthermore, this eternal nature of the Buddha is directly linked to the practitioner’s own inherent, eternal potential for Buddhahood.³⁴

The Lotus Sutra‘s doctrines of Universal Buddhahood and the Eternal Buddha are not merely abstract philosophical points for Nichiren; they constitute the essential ontological and soteriological foundation that renders his core practice—chanting Nam Myoho Renge Kyo—meaningful and efficacious. Without the inherent potential within all beings (Universal Buddhahood) and an eternally present, ultimate reality (Eternal Buddha/Mystic Law) to connect with, the practice of chanting would lack its claimed transformative power. These doctrines provide the very basis for what is real (inherent potential, eternal truth) and how salvation or enlightenment occurs (activating this potential through practice in connection with the eternal reality).

III. Myo Ho Ren Ge Kyo: The Essence of the Lotus Sutra

Central to Nichiren Daishonin’s teachings and the passage under examination is the profound significance attributed to the phrase Myo Ho Ren Ge Kyo, the Japanese title of the Lotus Sutra, most commonly encountered in its chanted form, Namu Myoho Renge Kyo.

A. Decoding the Phrase: Namu, Myo, Ho, Renge, Kyo

Nichiren and subsequent traditions ascribe deep, layered meanings to each component of the phrase:

• Namu (or Nam): Derived from the Sanskrit namas, this signifies devotion, reverence, dedication, or “to devote oneself”.³⁵ It represents the crucial element of faith and the practitioner’s active engagement—the correct action and attitude needed to connect with the Mystic Law and attain Buddhahood.⁴⁴
• Myoho: This compound term translates to the “Mystic Law”.⁴⁴ It encapsulates the ultimate, fundamental principle governing life and the universe.

• Myō: Meaning “mystic,” “wonderful,” “miraculous,” or “beyond comprehension”.¹² It points to the inconceivable nature of life, the ultimate reality that transcends ordinary understanding and verbal expression. It signifies the intangible essence, the potentiality, the inherent Buddha-nature within all phenomena.⁴⁴
• Hō: Meaning “Law,” “Dharma,” “principle,” or “doctrine”.⁴⁴ It refers to the tangible manifestations of this Mystic Law, the way reality functions, the phenomenal world perceived by the senses.⁴⁴ Myoho together thus expresses the relationship between the invisible, essential nature of life (Myō) and its visible, diverse expressions (Hō).⁴⁵
• Renge: Meaning “Lotus Flower”.⁴⁴ This potent symbol conveys several key principles:

• Simultaneity of Cause and Effect (inga guji): The lotus plant uniquely blossoms and produces seeds concurrently.⁴⁴ This symbolizes the Buddhist law of causality (karma), where our actions (causes) shape our reality (effects). Crucially, it also implies that the effect (Buddhahood) is inherent within the cause (the life of the ordinary person practicing). Attaining enlightenment is not a distant future reward but a potential realizable in the present moment through practice.⁴⁷
• Purity Amidst Impurity: The lotus grows in muddy water yet emerges pristine and undefiled.⁴ This symbolizes the emergence of the pure state of Buddhahood from within the “mud” of the ordinary person’s life, replete with earthly desires, suffering, and delusion.⁴⁵
• Kyō: Literally meaning “sutra,” the teachings or voice of a Buddha.⁴⁴ It also carries connotations of sound, rhythm, and vibration, reflecting the importance of the chanted word.⁴⁵ In a broader sense, Kyō signifies that all phenomena throughout the universe are expressions or manifestations of the Mystic Law (Myoho Renge Kyo).⁴⁴ Nichiren also associated the characters of Myoho Renge Kyo with the act of “seeing the Buddha”.¹²

B. Why it is the “Sole Intent”: Condensing the Sutra’s Truth

Nichiren’s assertion in the passage that the five characters Myo Ho Ren Ge Kyo are “the sole intent of the whole sutra” is a radical claim central to his entire system. He posits that this phrase is not merely the title of the scripture but its very heart, essence, and “soul”.²

Myoho Renge Kyo (and by extension, Nam Myoho Renge Kyo) is understood as the ultimate Law (Dharma) permeating all existence, the fundamental reality to which Shakyamuni and all Buddhas are enlightened.² It embodies the principle of the “true aspect of all phenomena” and the eternal life of the Buddha.⁶

Consequently, chanting the Daimoku is considered equivalent to reciting the entire Lotus Sutra from beginning to end, embodying all its teachings and merits.²³ Nichiren connected this to the Tiantai doctrine of ichinen sanzen, asserting that the chanting of Daimoku is the concrete means by which the potential of the three thousand realms inherent in each moment of life is activated.⁶ The phrase itself is seen as the “seed” of Buddhahood ³⁵, containing within it the cause and effect of enlightenment.⁵⁵

The emphasis on Namu (devotion/action) and Kyō (sound/vibration) suggests that the Daimoku functions as more than a symbolic representation; it operates as a performative utterance. The physical act of chanting, when infused with faith, is believed to directly enact or call forth the reality it names—the practitioner’s inherent Buddhahood and harmony with the Mystic Law.⁶ It bridges the gap between potential (Myō) and manifestation (Hō), making the chant an action that generates the state of being it signifies.

C. The Practice of Chanting Daimoku (Shōdai)

The chanting of Nam Myoho Renge Kyo, known as Shōdai (唱題) or simply chanting Daimoku, constitutes the fundamental and primary practice across all schools of Nichiren Buddhism.² Typically, this involves the repetitive recitation of the phrase, often for a designated period morning and evening, while facing the Gohonzon—a calligraphic mandala inscribed by Nichiren that embodies the Mystic Law and the life-state of Buddhahood.⁶ This primary practice is often supplemented by the recitation (gongyō) of key excerpts from the Lotus Sutra, particularly from the “Expedient Means” (Chapter 2) and “Life Span” (Chapter 16) chapters.⁴¹

The stated purposes and benefits of this practice are manifold:

• Attaining Buddhahood: The ultimate goal is to achieve enlightenment or Buddhahood within this lifetime (sokushin jōbutsu).⁷
• Activating Buddha-Nature: To awaken, summon forth, and manifest the inherent Buddha potential dormant within one’s life.⁶
• Harmonization: To align one’s individual life with the rhythm and Law of the universe (Dharma), achieving a state of harmony.⁷
• Karma Transformation: To eradicate negative karma accumulated from past actions and transform suffering into enlightenment.²
• Inner Transformation (“Human Revolution”): To achieve profound inner change, developing wisdom, compassion, courage, resilience, and unshakable happiness.⁷
• World Peace: To contribute to peace and harmony in society by transforming individual lives and activating protective forces.⁴³

A defining characteristic of Daimoku practice is its accessibility. Nichiren stressed that it could be effectively performed by anyone, regardless of their level of intellectual understanding, emotional state, social standing, or prior religious training.¹¹

The principle of simultaneity, symbolized by Renge (lotus), is deeply embedded in the practice itself. Chanting Daimoku is viewed as both the cause (the act of practice infused with faith) and the effect (the manifestation of Buddhahood, the experience of transformation) occurring simultaneously within the present moment.⁴⁴ This collapses the linear progression often associated with gradual paths to enlightenment, emphasizing the immediate potential accessible through the practice.⁶ The goal (Buddhahood) is not a far-off destination but an inherent reality accessed and manifested through the present action of chanting with faith.

IV. Philosophical Interpretations of the Analogies

The passage employs two key analogies—muddy water reflecting the moon and plants receiving rain—to illustrate the nature of Nichiren Buddhist practice and its effects. These analogies offer philosophical insights into inherent potential, the role of practice, and the relationship between the individual and the ultimate reality (Mystic Law).

A. Muddy Water Reflecting the Moon: Innate Buddhahood and Practice Beyond Intellect

The first analogy presents an image of muddy water, which, despite lacking inherent consciousness or intent (“no mind”), naturally reflects the moon when conditions allow, thereby becoming clear or “lucid.”

• Interpretation:

• Innate Potential: The muddy water represents the mind of the ordinary person, clouded by delusions, earthly desires, and suffering. The mud corresponds to the impurities and obscurations that prevent clarity. However, just as water possesses the inherent capacity to reflect light, all sentient beings possess an innate, incorruptible Buddha-nature (busshō).⁴³ This potential exists even when obscured.
• Practice as Catalyst: The moon symbolizes the pure, illuminating reality of the Mystic Law, the eternal truth, or the inherent Buddha-nature itself. The reflection occurs “naturally” when the conditions are conducive—when the water settles or external factors allow. In Nichiren Buddhism, the practice of chanting Nam Myoho Renge Kyo acts as the essential condition or catalyst.⁴⁵ Chanting, particularly when directed towards the Gohonzon (often described as a mirror reflecting one’s innate Buddhahood ⁴⁵), allows the “moon” of the Mystic Law/Buddha-nature to become manifest within the practitioner’s life, thereby clarifying the “water” of their mind.
• Beyond Intellect/Intent: The crucial point, emphasized in the passage, is that the water reflects the moon “without mind.” It does not require intellectual understanding of astronomy or optics, nor does it deliberately try to reflect. This directly parallels the assertion that Nichiren’s practice is effective regardless of the practitioner’s intellectual grasp of complex Buddhist doctrine.¹¹ The lucidity (enlightenment, clarity) arises not from cognitive effort but as a natural consequence of the interaction between the inherent potential (water’s reflectivity/Buddha-nature) and the practice (allowing the moon’s light/Mystic Law to be received and reflected). Faith in the process, rather than intellectual comprehension, is the key requirement.

B. Plants Catching Rain: Natural Harmony with the Dharma through Practice

The second analogy depicts plants and trees receiving rain, which causes them to blossom and flourish, again questioning whether this occurs through deliberate intent on the part of the plants.

• Interpretation:

• Natural Alignment: Plants and trees represent practitioners or sentient beings. Rain symbolizes the nourishing Dharma, the teachings of the Lotus Sutra, the Mystic Law embodied in Nam Myoho Renge Kyo, or the blessings received through chanting and faith.⁵² Just as plants are naturally constituted to absorb and benefit from rain, beings are understood to be inherently connected to the universal Law (Dharma). The practice of chanting is akin to positioning oneself to receive this life-giving “rain”.³⁸
• Effortless Effect (Post-Practice): While the act of practice (chanting) requires conscious effort and dedication, the result—blossoming, flourishing, attaining benefits, realizing enlightenment—unfolds naturally, much like a plant grows after being watered. It is not presented as a product of the practitioner’s personal skill, wisdom, or manipulation of the outcome. Rather, it is the natural consequence of aligning oneself with the fundamental Law through the act of practice.
• Universality: Rain benefits all plants capable of receiving it; similarly, the Dharma, accessed through chanting Daimoku, is universally available to nourish all beings toward realizing their inherent potential.³³
• Harmony: The process illustrates a fundamental harmony between the individual being and the universal Law. This harmony is not achieved through complex intellectual maneuvering but through the simple, direct act of practice—receiving the Dharma’s “rain.”

While these analogies powerfully emphasize the naturalness and accessibility of the transformative process, highlighting the lack of need for deliberate intellectual effort in the mechanism of enlightenment itself, they should not be interpreted as advocating complete passivity. The water must be present to reflect the moon; the plant must exist and be receptive to absorb the rain. This implicitly underscores the necessity of the practitioner’s active engagement through the act of practice—chanting Daimoku with faith.⁶ The analogies primarily illustrate the nature of the result and the mechanism of connection to the inherent potential or Law, which unfolds naturally once the practice is initiated, rather than negating the requirement for that initial, active engagement.

Furthermore, both analogies point towards a deeply immanent conception of the sacred or ultimate reality. The moon’s reflection appears within the muddy water, not separate from it; the rain nourishes the plant from within, integrating with its nature. This resonates strongly with Nichiren’s teaching that the Mystic Law (Myoho Renge Kyo) is not an external entity but is one’s own life itself ⁴³, and that Buddhahood is inherent within the ordinary person.³⁴ The analogies visually reinforce the doctrine that the ultimate reality and the potential for awakening are not distant, external goals but immanent realities to be manifested from within through the catalyst of practice.

V. The Ever-Present Buddha and Reliance on Inherent Buddhahood

The passage concludes by advocating reliance on the “Ever-Present Buddha” as the key to harmony, explicitly contrasting this with reliance on personal skills or wisdom. This points directly to the interconnected concepts of Buddha-nature (busshō) and the Eternal Buddha within Nichiren’s framework.

A. Understanding Buddha-Nature (Busshō) / Inherent Buddhahood in Nichiren Buddhism

The doctrine of inherent Buddhahood is a cornerstone of Mahayana Buddhism, profoundly emphasized in the Lotus Sutra and central to Nichiren’s teachings.

• Definition and Source: Busshō refers to the fundamental, innate potential for enlightenment that exists within all sentient beings without exception.⁶ Its explicit affirmation in the Lotus Sutra ⁶ forms the basis for Nichiren’s conviction in universal salvation. Nichiren goes further to equate this Buddha-nature directly with the Mystic Law, Myoho Renge Kyo itself.⁵⁰
• Nature and State: It is not conceived as a permanent, independent “soul” (ātman), a concept rejected by Buddhism, but rather as the inherent capacity to awaken to the true nature of reality—the Mystic Law.³⁷ It is the “seed” of Buddhahood ³⁵, encompassing the potential for all Ten Worlds (from hell to Buddhahood) which are mutually possessed within each moment of life.¹² In ordinary beings, this potential is typically dormant, obscured by fundamental ignorance (mumyō), earthly desires (bonnō), and negative karma. Nichiren uses analogies like “muddy water”, a “tarnished mirror” ⁴⁵, or a “caged bird” ⁴³ to describe this obscured state.
• Connection to the Eternal Buddha: Crucially, the inherent Buddhahood within each individual is understood as being fundamentally non-different from the infinite, eternal life of the Original Buddha revealed in the Lotus Sutra‘s “Life Span” chapter.¹² Chanting Nam Myoho Renge Kyo is the means to bridge the apparent gap between the ordinary person’s life and this ultimate reality. For many followers, Nichiren Daishonin himself embodies this connection, representing the “Buddha of the Latter Day of the Law” who makes this realization accessible.⁵

B. The Practice of Reliance: Faith and Chanting as Activation

The passage’s directive to “rely on the Ever-Present Buddha” rather than personal abilities requires careful interpretation within Nichiren’s system.

• Rejection of Self-Sufficiency: The explicit statement that practitioners need not rely on their “own skills or wisdom” aligns perfectly with the arguments in the Shishin Gohon-Shō concerning the inadequacy of individual capacity in Mappō.¹¹ The practice is designed to be effective regardless of whether one is “brilliant or slow”.
• Reliance on Ultimate Reality: The “Ever-Present Buddha” signifies the eternal reality of the Mystic Law (Myoho Renge Kyo), the life of the Original Buddha, and ultimately, the practitioner’s own inherent Buddha-nature, which is non-different from this ultimate reality.⁶ Reliance, therefore, means trusting in and connecting with this fundamental truth.
• Faith as the Essential Link: Faith (shin or shinjin) is presented as the indispensable element enabling this reliance.⁶ It is faith in the Gohonzon (as the embodiment of the Law and the Buddha’s enlightened life ⁶), faith in the power of Nam Myoho Renge Kyo, and ultimately, faith in one’s own inherent potential for Buddhahood.⁴³ This faith is not passive belief but an active conviction that becomes the “cause for wisdom”.¹¹
• Chanting as Activation: The concrete method for activating this inherent potential and enacting this reliance is the chanting of Nam Myoho Renge Kyo.⁶ Nichiren’s analogy of the “caged bird” vividly illustrates this: the chanting (the caged bird’s song) summons forth the innate Buddha-nature (the birds flying free, representing the universal Buddha-nature embodied in the Gohonzon), prompting the caged bird (the practitioner’s own potential) to emerge.⁴³ The Gohonzon serves as the essential object of devotion, the mirror towards which one chants to reflect and manifest this inner potential.³⁰

This doctrine of reliance on the inherent/Ever-Present Buddha, activated by the simple, accessible practice of chanting Daimoku fueled by faith, represents a significant democratization and empowerment within the Buddhist landscape. It shifts the locus of spiritual authority and the potential for enlightenment away from reliance on monastic elites, complex meditative disciplines, or profound intellectual mastery, placing it firmly within the reach of the ordinary lay practitioner.¹¹

It is crucial, however, to understand that “reliance” in this context does not imply passive dependence or abdication of effort. Nichiren Buddhism consistently emphasizes diligent practice (shōjin)—both chanting and studying the teachings (Gosho)—and the importance of strong determination.⁶ Faith is an active conviction ⁴⁷, and chanting is described using active verbs like summoning, activating, polishing, and forging.⁴⁹ Therefore, reliance signifies trusting in and actively engaging with the fundamental reality of the Mystic Law and one’s inherent Buddha-nature through the prescribed actions of faith and chanting. It means relying on this ultimate truth rather than on the limitations of one’s personal ego, fluctuating intellect, or transient emotional states. It is an active alignment with the universal Law, not passive waiting for external intervention.

VI. Practice, Harmony, and Individual Capacity

The passage asserts a direct link between reliance on the Ever-Present Buddha through practice and achieving “harmony with the world,” further claiming this efficacy transcends the practitioner’s intellectual capacity or emotional state.

A. Chanting Daimoku as the Path to Harmony

Nichiren Buddhism posits that the practice of chanting Nam Myoho Renge Kyo is the fundamental means to achieve harmony on multiple levels:

• Harmony with the Universe: The core idea is that chanting aligns the microcosm of the individual’s life with the macrocosm of the universe, tuning the practitioner’s inner rhythm to the fundamental rhythm or Law (Dharma/Mystic Law) that governs all existence.⁷ This resonance brings about a state of fundamental harmony.
• Inner Harmony and Peace: The practice is presented as a direct path to inner peace, joy, and the transformation of suffering.⁷ By chanting, one “polishes the mirror” of the mind, clearing away the “dust” of delusion and negative karma, leading to clarity and resilience.⁴⁵ This inner transformation allows individuals to face life’s inevitable challenges with greater strength and equanimity.
• Interpersonal Harmony: Nichiren Buddhism teaches the principle of eshō funi, the oneness of self (life) and environment.⁵⁰ This means that an inner transformation within the practitioner inevitably affects their external world, including their relationships. By chanting to transform one’s own inner state—overcoming negativity, developing compassion and wisdom—one can positively influence and harmonize relationships with others.⁶⁷ The practice fosters empathy and the ability to bring people together.⁷⁰
• Societal Harmony: Extending the principle of eshō funi, Nichiren strongly believed that the widespread practice of the correct teaching (the Lotus Sutra via Daimoku) was essential for the peace and prosperity of the nation (Risshō Ankoku Ron).⁵ Chanting is believed to activate benevolent protective forces (shoten zenjin) in the universe and contribute to establishing a peaceful society.⁵³

Achieving “harmony with the world” through this practice should not be misconstrued as necessarily leading to a life devoid of problems or conflict. Nichiren Buddhism fully acknowledges the inherent sufferings of existence in the saha world, a realm requiring endurance.³¹ Harmony, in this context, refers less to the absence of external difficulties and more to the development of an inner state of Buddhahood—characterized by wisdom, compassion, courage, and life force—that allows the practitioner to navigate challenges resiliently, transform “poison into medicine” ⁶⁸, and create value even amidst adversity. It signifies an empowered alignment with the fundamental Law, enabling effective and compassionate engagement with the world, rather than a passive state of undisturbed tranquility.³⁸

B. Transcendence of Intellect and Emotional State in Practice

A radical aspect of Nichiren’s teaching, clearly stated in the passage, is that the efficacy of chanting Daimoku is not contingent upon the practitioner’s intellectual understanding or their fluctuating emotional state.

• Independence from Intellect: As established in the Shishin Gohon-Shō and echoed in the analogies, deep philosophical comprehension is not a prerequisite for the practice to yield results.¹¹ The analogy of a baby being nourished by milk without understanding its properties is pertinent.¹¹ Chanting is said to bypass the limitations of the conceptual mind, inscribing the Sutra’s power directly onto one’s life.³⁹
• Independence from Emotional State: The passage explicitly states the practice works whether one is “focused or distracted, calm or agitated”. Practitioners are encouraged to chant “just as they are,” bringing their authentic emotional state—be it grief, anger, joy, or confusion—directly to the practice.³⁹ Chanting is not dependent on achieving a calm mental state beforehand; rather, the act of chanting itself serves as the means to transform negative emotions, cultivate resilience, and ultimately achieve inner peace.⁶²
• Faith as the Constant: While intellectual grasp and emotional stability may vary, the constant and crucial factor determining the practice’s effectiveness is faith (shinjin).⁶ It is the unwavering conviction in the Mystic Law, the Gohonzon, and one’s own potential that unlocks the power of the chant.

The apparent paradox—that practice works regardless of intellectual or emotional state, yet simultaneously requires strong faith and determination—can be understood by distinguishing the initiation of the practice from the inherent mechanism of the Law’s response. The practitioner must actively exert faith and effort to begin and sustain the practice of chanting Daimoku.⁴⁷ However, once this connection is established through faith-fueled practice, the Mystic Law is believed to respond based on its own universal and inherent principles, interacting with the practitioner’s fundamental life-state. This response, like a natural law, operates independently of the practitioner’s fluctuating surface thoughts or emotions at any given moment.³⁹ The power ultimately derives from the Law itself, activated and accessed through the consistent practice grounded in faith.

VII. Faith Over Intellect: A Comparative Perspective

Nichiren Daishonin’s pronounced emphasis on faith, particularly as articulated in the Shishin Gohon-Shō, stands in distinct contrast to the approaches found in other major schools of Buddhist thought. Understanding these differences illuminates the unique position Nichiren carved out for his teachings, especially concerning practice in the Latter Day of the Law.

A. Nichiren’s Emphasis in the Latter Day (Shishin Gohon Sho)

The Shishin Gohon-Shō makes a clear case for the primacy of faith in Mappō. Its core argument rests on the premise that the innate wisdom of people in this age is insufficient to grasp the profound truths of the Lotus Sutra through conventional means.¹¹ Therefore, Nichiren argues, the Buddha prescribed substituting faith for wisdom, making faith the very foundation (ki) of practice for those in the initial stages.¹¹ Faith is not merely belief but the direct cause that enables the practitioner to access the Buddha wisdom inherent within the Mystic Law.¹¹ Conversely, disbelief (fushin) is identified as the cause of slandering the Law and falling into the hell of incessant suffering.¹¹

This emphasis leads Nichiren to de-emphasize, for beginners in Mappō, the traditional “three types of learning”—precepts, meditation, and wisdom—which were considered the comprehensive framework of Buddhist practice in earlier times.¹¹ He contends that exclusive devotion to chanting Daimoku inherently contains the merit of all these practices.¹¹ The single “Diamond Chalice Precept”—upholding faith in and practice of Nam Myoho Renge Kyo—is seen as encompassing the spirit of all other precepts.²³ From this perspective, ethical conduct or morality is not a prerequisite for awakening but rather an effect or natural outcome of the inner transformation brought about by faith and chanting.²³

B. Comparison with Other Buddhist Schools

Comparing Nichiren’s approach with other traditions highlights the diversity within Buddhism regarding the roles of faith, practice, and intellect:

• Zen Buddhism: Zen traditions (Chan in China, Seon in Korea) generally prioritize direct, experiential realization of one’s Buddha-nature through practices like zazen (sitting meditation) and mindfulness in daily activities.¹⁴ While not entirely dismissing faith or scripture, the emphasis is typically on self-reliance and insight gained through meditative discipline, often minimizing reliance on external figures or complex doctrines.¹⁴ This contrasts sharply with Nichiren’s focus on faith in the Lotus Sutra/Gohonzon and the power of chanting. Nichiren criticized Zen for what he saw as its dismissal of the Buddha’s explicit teachings (sutras).⁵ Some practitioners find the active chanting of Nichiren Buddhism antithetical to Zen’s silent contemplation ³⁹, although some individuals integrate aspects of both.²¹
• Pure Land Buddhism (Jōdo-shū, Jōdo Shinshū): This tradition shares with Nichiren Buddhism an emphasis on faith and a simple chanting practice (Nembutsu – Namu Amida Butsu) as the primary means of salvation, making it highly accessible to lay practitioners.¹³ However, crucial differences exist. The object of faith is Amida Buddha and his vows to bring beings to his Pure Land, Sukhavati.¹⁸ The primary goal is typically rebirth in that Pure Land, seen as an ideal environment for attaining final enlightenment, rather than Buddhahood in this present lifetime and world.³ Furthermore, Pure Land, particularly Jōdo Shinshū, emphasizes reliance on the “other-power” (tariki) of Amida Buddha, often minimizing the role of “self-power” (jiriki), whereas Nichiren Buddhism integrates self-power (faith and practice) with the other-power (of the Mystic Law and the Buddha).¹⁶ Nichiren viewed Pure Land practice as ineffective and slanderous in Mappō.³
• Theravada Buddhism: Considered by its adherents to be closest to the original teachings of the Buddha as preserved in the Pali Canon, Theravada emphasizes a gradual path to liberation (Nibbana, Nirvana) through the cultivation of morality (Sīla), concentration/meditation (Samādhi), and wisdom (Paññā)—the Noble Eightfold Path.³¹ The ideal is often monastic life, focusing on self-liberation (achieving Arhatship) through personal effort, mindfulness, and insight meditation (Vipassanā).⁷⁵ Faith (saddhā) is considered essential as an initial motivation and trust in the teachings, but it must ultimately be confirmed and superseded by direct experiential wisdom.⁷³ This contrasts significantly with Nichiren’s Mahayana goal of Buddhahood for all, his focus on the Lotus Sutra as the ultimate teaching for Mappō, the centrality of Daimoku chanting over silent meditation or precept-keeping as the primary practice, and the elevation of faith as the key substitute for wisdom in the current age.²²
• Tibetan Buddhism (Vajrayana): This complex tradition, encompassing Mahayana philosophy and unique Vajrayana (Tantric) methods, employs a wide array of practices. These include intricate visualizations of deities, recitation of mantras (distinct in function and form from Daimoku), use of mudras (hand gestures), elaborate rituals, and a strong emphasis on the guidance of a qualified teacher or guru (lama).⁵⁹ The path is often structured through gradual stages (Lamrim), with tantric practices considered a potentially swift but demanding route to enlightenment, requiring proper initiation and guidance.⁵⁹ While sharing Mahayana foundations like the bodhisattva ideal (bodhicitta) and the philosophy of emptiness (śūnyatā), the diverse and often complex methodologies of Tibetan Buddhism differ markedly from the singular focus on chanting Daimoku to the Gohonzon that characterizes Nichiren Buddhism.⁵⁹ Nichiren’s critiques of esoteric Buddhism (Shingon), which shares some roots with Vajrayana, indicate his rejection of such practices for Mappō.⁵

While Nichiren Buddhism places a unique emphasis on faith over intellect, particularly for the context of Mappō, a comparative view reveals that “faith” itself is understood and utilized differently across Buddhist traditions. It ranges from the initial trust required in Theravada, which must be validated by experiential wisdom ⁷³, to the profound devotional surrender central to Pure Land’s reliance on Amida’s grace ¹⁶, to the serene commitment described in general Mahayana texts ⁷³, and the devotion directed towards gurus and deities in Tibetan practice.⁵⁹ Zen often shifts the focus away from faith in external objects towards faith in one’s own capacity for direct experience.¹⁴ Nichiren’s specific contribution lies in positioning faith not merely as a starting point or devotional attitude, but as the primary, sufficient engine for activating inherent Buddhahood and accessing Buddha wisdom directly, precisely because of the perceived limitations of Mappō.¹¹

Furthermore, the type of practice emphasized fundamentally shapes the character and accessibility of each school. Nichiren’s deliberate choice of Daimoku chanting—a practice derived from the revered Lotus Sutra but simplified to its essence—was strategic. He selected a method deemed powerful yet universally applicable, requiring neither extensive learning nor specific meditative prowess, directly contrasting it with the perceived complexities, gradualism, or (in his view) inefficacy of practices like zazen, vipassanā, Nembutsu, or esoteric rituals for the people of his time.¹¹ This choice of practice is thus a defining element, reflecting Nichiren’s diagnosis of the age and his proposed remedy.

C. Comparative Table of Buddhist Schools on Key Features

The following table summarizes some key distinctions discussed above:

Feature	Nichiren Buddhism	Zen Buddhism	Pure Land Buddhism	Theravada Buddhism	Tibetan Buddhism (Vajrayana)
Primary Focus	Lotus Sutra; Nam Myoho Renge Kyo	Direct Experience; Meditation (Zazen)	Amitabha Buddha; Sukhavati Rebirth	Pali Canon; Liberation (Nibbana)	Enlightenment for all; Tantric Path
Core Practice	Chanting Daimoku; Faith in Gohonzon	Sitting Meditation (Zazen)	Chanting Nembutsu (Namu Amida Butsu)	Precepts, Meditation (Vipassana), Wisdom	Visualization, Mantra, Guru Yoga, Rituals
Role of Faith	Foundational; Substitutes for Wisdom (Mappō)	Secondary to Direct Experience	Foundational; Trust in Amida’s Vow	Initial Step; Verified by Experience	Important; Devotion to Guru/Deity
Role of Intellect	Secondary to Faith/Practice (Mappō)	Insight arises from Practice	Secondary to Faith/Chanting	Essential (Wisdom/Panna)	Important (Study), but subservient to practice/realization
Path	Immediate (Buddhahood in this life)	Direct/Sudden or Gradual	Other-Power reliant; Rebirth focused	Gradual Path (Sila, Samadhi, Panna)	Gradual stages; Tantra as swift path
Key Text(s)	Lotus Sutra; Gosho	Varies (Heart Sutra, etc.); Koans	Pure Land Sutras	Pali Canon (Suttas, Vinaya, Abhidhamma)	Sutras, Tantras, Termas, Lamrim

Table based on analysis of snippets including.³

VIII. Synthesis: The Universal Accessibility of Nichiren’s Path

A. Integrating the Passage’s Message with Doctrine

The passage from the Shishin Gohon-Shō serves as a potent distillation of core Nichiren Buddhist doctrines related to practice and attainment in the Latter Day of the Law. Its message seamlessly integrates several key principles:

• Natural Harmony and Inherent Potential: The analogies of the muddy water reflecting the moon and plants blossoming in the rain illustrate the inherent Buddha-nature within all beings and the natural way this potential is actualized through practice, without reliance on intellectual understanding. This connects directly to the doctrine of inherent Buddhahood (busshō) and the concept of the “Ever-Present Buddha” as the fundamental reality within and without.⁶
• Daimoku as Sole Intent: The assertion that Myo Ho Ren Ge Kyo constitutes the “sole intent” of the Lotus Sutra encapsulates Nichiren’s teaching on the supremacy of the Sutra and the power of its title (Daimoku) to embody its entire essence and merit.²
• Faith Over Intellect: The statement that beginners can practice effectively “without knowing the heart” of the Sutra, and that reliance on personal “skills or wisdom” is unnecessary, directly reflects the Shishin Gohon-Shō‘s central argument for substituting faith for wisdom in Mappō.¹¹
• Practice as Activation: The implication throughout is that practice—specifically chanting Nam Myoho Renge Kyo with faith—is the essential key that activates the inherent potential, clarifies the mind, and brings about natural harmonization with the Dharma.⁶

B. Efficacy for All Individuals: Attaining Buddhahood in This Lifetime

The synthesized message powerfully underscores the universal accessibility and efficacy of Nichiren’s proposed path:

• Universality: The practice is explicitly presented as effective for all individuals, irrespective of their intellectual capacity (“brilliant or slow”), mental state (“focused or distracted, calm or agitated”), social status, gender, past deeds, or level of prior Buddhist understanding.⁴ This radical inclusivity is grounded in the Lotus Sutra‘s teaching of universal Buddha-nature.
• Immediacy: The ultimate goal is not postponed to future lifetimes or contingent upon rebirth in a Pure Land, but is the attainment of Buddhahood in this very lifetime (sokushin jōbutsu).⁶ The practice of chanting Daimoku is believed to provide direct and immediate access to one’s enlightened potential.
• Empowerment: This accessibility translates into profound empowerment for the individual. Practitioners are encouraged to take responsibility for their own lives and suffering, understanding that they possess the inherent capacity and the practical means (chanting Daimoku) to transform their karma, overcome obstacles, and forge genuine happiness from within.³⁸

From Nichiren’s perspective, the attainment of Buddhahood through chanting Daimoku in Mappō is presented almost as the most “natural” course. Just as water inherently reflects and plants inherently grow when conditions are met, beings who encounter and practice the Mystic Law through chanting are believed to naturally manifest their inherent potential.⁴⁴ Enlightenment is thus reframed not as an extraordinary feat achieved against the grain of existence, but as a return to, or revelation of, one’s true, fundamental nature—a process facilitated by the specific practice deemed correct and potent for the challenging conditions of the Latter Day of the Law.³⁴

This emphasis on universal accessibility and demonstrable efficacy (“actual proof”) also serves a crucial polemical function within Nichiren’s arguments.²³ By claiming that his practice works for everyone, here and now, and leads to tangible transformations in life ⁹, Nichiren implicitly and explicitly contrasted it with other schools he deemed ineffective, overly complex, or inaccessible for the people of Mappō.¹ The lived experience of practitioners achieving benefits and inner transformation thus becomes a cornerstone validation of the teaching’s legitimacy and its claim to be the supreme path for the current age.

Conclusion

Summary of Findings: This analysis of the passage from Nichiren Daishonin’s Shishin Gohon-Shō has explored its multifaceted meaning within the context of his life, the turbulent Mappō era, and his broader doctrinal framework. Nichiren’s teachings, deeply rooted in the Lotus Sutra, emphasize the scripture’s supremacy and the unique power of chanting its title, Nam Myoho Renge Kyo (Daimoku), as the essential practice for the Latter Day of the Law. The passage highlights that this practice embodies the “sole intent” of the Sutra. The analogies of the muddy water reflecting the moon and plants receiving rain philosophically illustrate the concept of inherent Buddha-nature and the natural, harmonious way practice aligns individuals with the Mystic Law, functioning effectively beyond the need for profound intellectual comprehension or specific emotional states. Central to this is the reliance on the “Ever-Present Buddha”—the eternal truth and potential within—activated through faith and the act of chanting. A comparative perspective reveals Nichiren’s distinctive emphasis on faith over intellect and the simplicity of Daimoku chanting, contrasting sharply with the methods and priorities of Zen, Pure Land, Theravada, and Tibetan Buddhism. Ultimately, the passage synthesizes a core message of universal accessibility: Nichiren’s path is presented as open and efficacious for all individuals, regardless of capacity, enabling them to transform their lives and attain Buddhahood in this lifetime.

Significance of the Passage: The examined passage serves as a remarkably concise encapsulation of fundamental Nichiren Buddhist principles concerning practice in Mappō. It articulates the shift from reliance on personal wisdom or complex disciplines to reliance on faith and the inherent power of the Mystic Law accessed through chanting. It justifies the centrality of Nam Myoho Renge Kyo and reassures practitioners of the practice’s efficacy even amidst personal limitations or confusion, grounding this accessibility in the doctrines of inherent Buddhahood and the natural functioning of the Dharma.

Enduring Message: The enduring message conveyed by this passage, and indeed by Nichiren’s broader teachings, is one of radical hope and empowerment. In an age perceived as one of decline and confusion, it asserts that the ultimate potential for enlightenment (Buddhahood) remains inherent within every individual. Furthermore, it presents a direct, accessible, and potent means—chanting Nam Myoho Renge Kyo with faith—through which this potential can be unlocked and manifested, leading to personal transformation and harmony with the world. It is a declaration that liberation is not the exclusive domain of the intellectually gifted, the spiritually advanced, or those in favorable circumstances, but is available here and now to all who embrace the Mystic Law through faith and practice.

Works cited

1. Nichiren – Wikipedia, accessed April 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nichiren
2. Nichiren – Tibetan Buddhist Encyclopedia, accessed April 12, 2025, https://tibetanbuddhistencyclopedia.com/en/index.php/Nichiren
3. http://www.princeton.edu, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.princeton.edu/~jstone/Articles%20on%20the%20Lotus%20Sutra%20Tendai%20and%20Nichiren%20Buddhism/The%20Moment%20of%20Death%20in%20Nichiren’s%20Thought%20(2003).pdf
4. Lotus Sutra | Mahayana Buddhism, Saddharma, Parable of Burning House | Britannica, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Lotus-Sutra
5. Nichiren – Wikiwand, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/Nichiren
6. Nichiren Buddhism – Wikipedia, accessed April 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nichiren_Buddhism
7. What is chanting nam-myoho-renge-kyo over and over supposed to do for those who chant it? : r/Buddhism – Reddit, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Buddhism/comments/1exjp0r/what_is_chanting_nammyohorengekyo_over_and_over/
8. Gosho -.:: GEOCITIES.ws ::., accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.geocities.ws/chris_holte/Buddhism/Gosho/index.html
9. The Blessings of the Lotus Sutra | WND I – Nichiren Buddhism Library, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.nichirenlibrary.org/en/wnd-1/Content/84
10. The Significance of the Four Dictums – World Tribune, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.worldtribune.org/2020/the-significance-of-the-four-dictums/
11. nichiren.info, accessed April 12, 2025, http://nichiren.info/wnd/094_0783.pdf
12. KWOON – Threefold Lotus Martial Arts, accessed April 12, 2025, http://threefoldlotus.com/guidance/volume3/singleminded.htm
13. Differences between nichiren and pureland – Dharma Wheel, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?t=23119
14. Meditation in Nichiren Buddhism – Buddhastate, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.buddhastate.com/2012/08/meditation-in-nichiren-buddhism/
15. The Two Meanings Implied in the Nembutsu Leading to the Hell of Incessant Suffering, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.nichirenlibrary.org/en/wnd-2/Content/191
16. Nichiren vs. Jodo Shinshu? : r/Buddhism – Reddit, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Buddhism/comments/414g7t/nichiren_vs_jodo_shinshu/
17. The Relative Merit of Reciting the Daimoku and Amida’s Name | WND II, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.nichirenlibrary.org/en/wnd-2/Content/358
18. What is the difference between Nichiren Buddhism and Pure Land Buddhism? – Reddit, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Buddhism/comments/ju25ng/what_is_the_difference_between_nichiren_buddhism/
19. Rebirth and the Ten Worlds in the different Nichiren traditions – Dharma Wheel, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?t=35291
20. Zen and Nichiren Buddhism – YouTube, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YP964luxVwo
21. Can one practice Zen AND Nichiren? – Dharma Wheel, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?t=34463
22. A Comparison of the Lotus and Other Sutras | WND I | Nichiren Buddhism Library, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.nichirenlibrary.org/en/wnd-1/Content/148
23. Nichiren Buddhism and the Precepts – Tricycle: The Buddhist Review, accessed April 12, 2025, https://tricycle.org/article/nichiren-buddhism-precepts/
24. NICHIREN BUDDHISM: HISTORY, BELIEFS AND DOOMSDAY LEADER – Facts and Details, accessed April 12, 2025, https://factsanddetails.com/japan/cat16/sub182/entry-7617.html
25. Nichiren Buddhism: A True and Authentic Form of Buddhism? – Reddit, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Buddhism/comments/1id2uxa/nichiren_buddhism_a_true_and_authentic_form_of/
26. So, Im on a discussion about the Lotus Sutra. : r/Buddhism – Reddit, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Buddhism/comments/15ur90q/so_im_on_a_discussion_about_the_lotus_sutra/
27. On the Four Stages of Faith and the Five Stages of Practice | WND I | Nichiren Buddhism Library, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.nichirenlibrary.org/en/wnd-1/Content/94
28. Soka Gakkai “Words of Nichiren Daishonmin” Vs. “Writings of Nichiren Shonin” Which writings does Nichiren Shu believe to be apocryphal? : r/NichirenBuddhism – Reddit, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/NichirenBuddhism/comments/1268gvp/soka_gakkai_words_of_nichiren_daishonmin_vs/
29. Nichiren’s problematic works – Dharma Wheel, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?t=27653
30. Entrance Level Study – The Real Aspect of the Gohonzon – nichiren.info, accessed April 12, 2025, http://nichiren.info/buddhism/library/SokaGakkai/Study/Entrance/Text2.htm
31. Translator’s Introduction | LSOC – Nichiren Buddhism Library, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.nichirenlibrary.org/en/lsoc/TranslatorsIntroduction/3
32. The Lotus Sutra, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.bdk.or.jp/document/dgtl-dl/dBET_T0262_LotusSutra_2007.pdf
33. The Lotus Sutra – SGI USA, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.sgi-usa.org/the-humanism-of-the-lotus-sutra/the-lotus-sutra/
34. Chapter 4: Nichiren Daishonin and the Lotus Sutra | Soka Gakkai (global), accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.sokaglobal.org/resources/study-materials/buddhist-study/the-basics-of-nichiren-buddhism-for-the-new-era-of-worldwide-kosen-rufu/chapter-4.html
35. Namu Myōhō Renge Kyō – Wikipedia, accessed April 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namu_My%C5%8Dh%C5%8D_Renge_Ky%C5%8D
36. Lotus Authenticity and Implications… – Dharma Wheel, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?t=16740
37. Chapter 1: The Lotus Sutra and the Practice of Nichiren Buddhism – NBANichiren Shu San Francisco Bay Area, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.nichirenbayarea.org/chapter-1-the-lotus-sutra-and-the-practice-of-nichiren-buddhism
38. BUDDHISM – SGI Canada, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.sgicanada.org/uploads/2.%20About%20Us/Introductory%20Materials/SGIBooklet-Buddhism%20a%20philosophy%20for%20living%20(June%202023).pdf
39. Chanting as the Whole of Life – Tricycle: The Buddhist Review, accessed April 12, 2025, https://tricycle.org/magazine/nichiren-chanting/
40. Lotus Sutra – Wikipedia, accessed April 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lotus_Sutra
41. Text of the Nichiren Chanting – BuddhaNet, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.buddhanet.net/chant-nichiren/
42. Practicing both Theravada and Nichiren Buddhism – Dhamma Wheel Buddhist Forum, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?t=31745
43. Faith in Revolution | buddhability, accessed April 12, 2025, https://buddhability.org/purpose/faith-in-revolution/
44. Daimoku Mantra : OM Meditation by Panagola, accessed April 12, 2025, http://panagola.com/om/?15
45. Inscription on ken – Translation Assistance – Nihonto Message Board, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.militaria.co.za/nmb/topic/6911-inscription-on-ken/
46. Practice | Vishawa Kirana Foundation, accessed April 12, 2025, https://vishwakirana.com/practice.php
47. The Meaning of Nam-myoho-renge-kyo | Soka Gakkai (global), accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.sokaglobal.org/resources/study-materials/buddhist-concepts/the-meaning-of-nam-myoho-renge-kyo.html
48. why refer to MyoHo RenGe Kyo as an entity ? – Dharma Wheel, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?t=34673
49. Nam Myoho Renge Kyo – SGI-UK, accessed April 12, 2025, https://sgi-uk.org/Philosophy/Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo
50. On Attaining Buddhahood in This Lifetime | WND I – Nichiren Buddhism Library, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.nichirenlibrary.org/en/wnd-1/Content/1
51. Nam-myoho-renge-kyo | Soka Gakkai (global), accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.sokaglobal.org/practicing-buddhism/nam-myoho-renge-kyo.html
52. Honseiji Temple, accessed April 12, 2025, https://honseiji.org/
53. The Liturgy of Nichiren Daishonin’s Buddhism, accessed April 12, 2025, https://sokagakkai1.weebly.com/uploads/4/7/4/2/47421675/_prayerbook_large-2.pdf
54. what we actually do as Nichiren Daishonin’s diciples – Dharma Wheel, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?t=35101
55. The Basics of Nichiren Buddhism | SGI USA, accessed April 12, 2025, https://cms.sgi-usa.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Intro_Exam_Material_Basics_of_Nichiren_Buddhism.pdf
56. How Does Nichiren Buddhism Different from Other Forms of Buddhism? – YouTube, accessed April 12, 2025, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=smUmLMicaR4&pp=ygUMI3Nhbmt5b19zb2tv
57. What is Nichiren Buddhism? – Reddit, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Buddhism/comments/a30otg/what_is_nichiren_buddhism/
58. Freeing The Caged Bird | The Search For Enlightenment, accessed April 12, 2025, https://anupadin.com/2011/07/10/freeing-the-caged-bird/
59. The difference between Tibetan Buddhism and the Buddhism of Nichiren Daishonin – Scribd, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/830206574/The-difference-between-Tibetan-Buddhism-and-the-Buddhism-of-Nichiren-Daishonin
60. Chanting for Buddhahood | Lion’s Roar, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.lionsroar.com/chanting-for-buddhahood/
61. Vajrayana as an aspect of Nichiren practice – Dharma Wheel, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?t=36682
62. Part 1: Happiness; Chapter 3: The Practice for Transforming Our State of Life [3.1] | Soka Gakkai (global), accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.sokaglobal.org/resources/study-materials/buddhist-study/the-wisdom-for-creating-happiness-and-peace/chapter-3-1.html
63. How Chanting Daimoku Can Bring You Peace, Power, and Purpose? – YouTube, accessed April 12, 2025, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0TqWNasrqOQ
64. Karma and Buddha Nature – Lotus Flower, accessed April 12, 2025, http://lotusflowersgi.blogspot.com/2009/10/on-karma-and-buddha-nature.html
65. Chanting Brings Forth Our Supreme Inner Life State (Part 1) – World Tribune, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.worldtribune.org/2020/chanting-brings-forth-our-supreme-inner-life-state-part-1/
66. Vibrant Chanting Opens the Great Path to Absolute Victory – World Tribune, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.worldtribune.org/2022/vibrant-chanting-opens-the-great-path-to-absolute-victory/
67. Benefits of Chanting Daimoku | Nichiren Buddhism – YouTube, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVaekO2TBrs
68. Part 2: Human Revolution Chapter 12: Transforming Karma into Mission [12.5] | Soka Gakkai (global), accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.sokaglobal.org/resources/study-materials/buddhist-study/the-wisdom-for-creating-happiness-and-peace/chapter-12-5.html
69. 7 Ways Daimoku Can Revitalize Our Lives – World Tribune, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.worldtribune.org/2023/7-ways-daimoku-can-revitalize-our-lives/
70. Building Harmonious Relationships – SGI USA, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.sgi-usa.org/2021/01/01/building-harmonious-relationships/
71. Human revolution | SGI-UK, accessed April 12, 2025, https://sgi-uk.org/Philosophy/Human-revolution
72. Chapter 3: Faith and Practice | Soka Gakkai (global), accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.sokaglobal.org/resources/study-materials/buddhist-study/the-basics-of-nichiren-buddhism-for-the-new-era-of-worldwide-kosen-rufu/chapter-3.html
73. Faith in Buddhism – Wikipedia, accessed April 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faith_in_Buddhism
74. Everything Begins With Prayer Infused With the Shared Vow of Mentor and Disciple, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.worldtribune.org/2021/everything-begins-with-prayer-infused-with-the-shared-vow-of-mentor-and-disciple/
75. Theravada Buddhism – RELIGIONS, accessed April 12, 2025, http://deathandreligion.plamienok.sk/files/119-Buddhism.pdf
76. Chanting Nam Myoho Renge Kyo Impact Emotional State – YouTube, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzAqyTzHikM
77. The Wisdom for Creating Happiness and Peace | Soka Gakkai (global), accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.sokaglobal.org/resources/study-materials/buddhist-study/the-wisdom-for-creating-happiness-and-peace.html
78. Session Five – April 29 – NBA Nichiren Shu San Francisco Bay Area, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.nichirenbayarea.org/session-five-april-29
79. Every school/tradition’s most effective method/practice to reach enlightenment… – Dharma Wheel, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?t=39020
80. Pure Land Buddhism – Wikipedia, accessed April 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_Land_Buddhism
81. Buddhism for Beginners Q&A | ARTICLE | Nichiren Shu Portal, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.nichiren.or.jp/english/article/read/id861/
82. New to Buddhism with questions – The Watercooler – Discuss & Discover – SuttaCentral, accessed April 12, 2025, https://discourse.suttacentral.net/t/new-to-buddhism-with-questions/22739
83. Nichiren Buddhism Vs. Tibetan Buddhism – Dharma Wheel, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?t=19137
84. Visualization meditation – Tricycle: The Buddhist Review, accessed April 12, 2025, https://tricycle.org/beginners/buddhism/visualization-meditation/
85. How to visualize rotating mantra? – Dharma Wheel, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?t=3270
86. Understanding the Different Types of Buddhism – One Mind Dharma, accessed April 12, 2025, https://oneminddharma.com/types-of-buddhism/
87. Nichiren, TienTai, and Lotus Sutra – Page 2 – Dharma Wheel, accessed April 12, 2025, https://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?t=23116&start=20