Mr. Altig’s Overview of the Wonderful Dharma of the Lotus Sutra

I. Introduction: Bridging Ancient Wisdom Streams

A. Overview of the I Ching and Lotus Sutra

Two monumental texts stand as pillars within the vast landscape of East Asian thought: the I Ching (易經, Yijing) or Classic of Changes, and the Saddharmapuṇḍarīka-sūtra, commonly known as the Lotus Sutra. The I Ching, originating in ancient China, began its life as a divination manual during the Western Zhou period (c. 1000–750 BCE).¹ Over centuries, it evolved beyond mere oracular practice, absorbing layers of commentary, most notably the “Ten Wings” attributed traditionally to Confucius and his school, transforming it into a profound philosophical and cosmological text deeply influential within both Confucian and Daoist traditions.¹ Its core concerns revolve around the nature of change (yi), the interplay of cosmic forces (Yin and Yang), and the provision of ethical and practical guidance for navigating the complexities of existence.¹

The Lotus Sutra, conversely, emerged from the fertile ground of Mahāyāna Buddhism in India, likely composed in stages between the first century BCE and the second century CE.⁹ As a foundational scripture of Mahāyāna (“Great Vehicle”) Buddhism ¹¹, it holds particular reverence in East Asian Buddhist schools such as Tiantai (Tendai in Japan) and Nichiren.⁹ The Sutra employs a distinctive style, rich in narrative, verse, and striking parables, to convey its central doctrines.⁹ Key among these are the concept of the “One Vehicle” (Ekayāna), asserting a single ultimate path to Buddhahood for all beings, and the importance of “skillful means” (upāya), the compassionate pedagogical methods employed by Buddhas to guide diverse individuals toward enlightenment.⁹ Unlike purely philosophical treatises, the Lotus Sutra often possesses a strong devotional and soteriological character, aiming to inspire faith and transform the lives of its adherents.⁹

B. Statement of Purpose

This report undertakes an expert-level comparative analysis of the I Ching and the Lotus Sutra. Its purpose is to explore the philosophical and symbolic resonances between these two seminal works, despite their origins in distinct cultural and religious traditions. The analysis will focus specifically on how each text addresses the fundamental themes of transformation, interdependence, and guidance—contrasting the interpretive, pattern-based approach of the I Ching with the pedagogical strategy of skillful means (upāya) central to the Lotus Sutra. Furthermore, the inquiry will delve into potential structural parallels, examining relationships between the I Ching‘s hexagrams and changing lines and the Lotus Sutra‘s chapters, parables, and the doctrine of the Ten Suchnesses.

C. Scope and Approach

The scope of this report encompasses a detailed examination of the foundational structures and cosmologies of both texts. It will proceed through a thematic comparison centered on transformation, interdependence, and guidance/upāya. Specific structural elements—hexagrams versus parables, and changing lines versus the Ten Suchnesses—will be analyzed for symbolic parallels. The analysis will also consider existing scholarly comparisons between the I Ching and Mahāyāna Buddhist thought, particularly concerning the Lotus Sutra. Finally, the findings will be synthesized to explore how the parallels and differences between these systems might offer complementary insights for contemporary spiritual or ethical reflection and practice. This approach aims not at a forced syncretism but at mutual illumination, seeking to understand how these ancient wisdom systems can inter-reflect and inform modern perspectives [User Query]. The analysis draws upon the provided research materials and adopts the perspective of a researcher specializing in comparative philosophy and religion.

D. Rationale for Comparison

Despite their distinct origins—one rooted in ancient Chinese cosmology interwoven with Confucian and Daoist thought, the other a cornerstone of Indian Mahāyāna Buddhism—both the I Ching and the Lotus Sutra grapple profoundly with the nature of reality conceived as dynamic and interconnected.² Both employ complex symbolic systems—the hexagrams of the I Ching ⁴ and the parables of the Lotus Sutra ¹⁷—to map this reality and guide human understanding and action within its flux. The I Ching seeks to chart the patterns of cosmic change to foster harmony and guide ethical action ⁶, while the Lotus Sutra narrates a path of spiritual transformation toward ultimate liberation and wisdom, employing adaptable teachings.⁹ The shared focus on dynamism and interdependence, coupled with the use of sophisticated symbolic frameworks to mediate understanding, suggests a potential convergence in how these disparate wisdom traditions addressed perennial human questions about change, meaning, and skillful navigation of life. This underlying similarity in approach—using symbolic systems to model a dynamic reality for the purpose of guidance—renders a comparative study potentially fruitful, promising to reveal shared structural logics or complementary insights even amidst differing metaphysical assumptions. The very use of intricate symbols in both traditions hints at a shared recognition that the deepest truths about reality and the path to wisdom may transcend purely literal or discursive explanation, requiring instead maps or models that resonate on multiple levels.

II. The I Ching: Mapping the Cosmos of Change

A. Structure and Cosmology: The Hexagrammatic Universe

The philosophical and cosmological framework of the I Ching is built upon the foundational concept of duality, embodied in the principles of Yin and Yang. Yang, represented by a solid, unbroken line (⚊), signifies the active, creative, light, and masculine force, while Yin, represented by a broken line (⚋), embodies the receptive, passive, dark, and feminine force.² These forces are not seen as antagonistic but as complementary and interdependent, governing the universe through their constant interplay, balance, and transformation.⁴

From the primary duality of Yin and Yang emerge the eight trigrams (Bagua), each a combination of three solid or broken lines.¹ Mythologically attributed to the sage Fuxi, who discerned these patterns from observing nature ¹, the trigrams represent fundamental forces or states such as Heaven, Earth, Thunder, Water, Mountain, Wind, Fire, and Lake.⁷ By combining any two of these trigrams, one above the other, the system generates the 64 hexagrams.¹ Each hexagram, a unique six-line figure, serves as an archetypal symbol representing a specific situation, phase of development, or configuration of forces within the cosmos and human life.²

The structure of a hexagram is read from the bottom line upwards.⁶ Some interpretive traditions associate the bottom two lines with Earth, the middle two with Humanity, and the top two with Heaven, suggesting a microcosm of the cosmic order.²⁶ Associated with each hexagram are textual layers that guide interpretation. These include the Hexagram Name, the Judgment (Tuan)—often attributed to King Wen of the Zhou dynasty, offering an overview of the situation’s potential ¹—and the Line Statements (Yao Ci), traditionally ascribed to the Duke of Zhou, providing specific counsel related to each of the six lines.¹ Later commentaries, collectively known as the Ten Wings (Shiyi), attributed largely to the Confucian school, further elaborated the philosophical and ethical dimensions of the text.¹

Central to the I Ching‘s worldview is the philosophy of yi—change. The cosmos is understood not as static but as a continuous, organismic process, an unceasing flow characterized by dynamism, wholeness, and continuity.² Everything is interconnected and in perpetual transformation, driven by the ceaseless interaction of Yin and Yang.⁶ The sequence of the 64 hexagrams, particularly in the traditional King Wen arrangement, is often interpreted as depicting this cyclical unfolding, mapping the development of situations from inception through culmination and back to potential beginnings.²

B. The Philosophy of Transformation: Changing Lines

Within the dynamic framework of the I Ching, the concept of “changing lines” (also known as moving lines) plays a crucial role in depicting transformation. These lines arise during the divination process—traditionally through methods like yarrow stalk manipulation or coin tossing, where specific numerical outcomes (often represented by values of 6 for “old Yin” or 9 for “old Yang”) designate a line as changing.⁶ A changing line signifies a point of instability or transition within the situation represented by the hexagram; it indicates that the Yin or Yang energy of that specific line is potent and on the verge of transforming into its opposite.⁶ A changing Yang line (9) becomes Yin, and a changing Yin line (6) becomes Yang.⁶

The interpretive significance of changing lines is profound. When one or more lines in a hexagram are designated as changing, the consultation involves reading not only the primary hexagram representing the present situation but also a second hexagram derived by transforming the changing lines into their opposites.¹ This secondary hexagram often indicates the potential future state, the direction of development, or the outcome toward which the current situation is tending. The changing lines themselves carry specific textual judgments that offer nuanced advice pertinent to the dynamic aspect they represent, pinpointing the locus of transformation within the broader context.²⁰

Philosophically, changing lines embody the core message of the I Ching: reality is inherently fluid, and transformation is not an anomaly but the constant condition of existence.² They highlight that any given state or situation contains within it the seeds of its own change, reflecting the perpetual cosmic dance of Yin and Yang. Understanding these points of potential shift is key to navigating the flow of events effectively. The presence of changing lines provides a narrative of evolution, mapping the trajectory from a present configuration to a future possibility.²⁰

C. Interdependence within the Hexagrammatic System

The structure of the I Ching itself reflects a deep principle of interdependence. The meaning and counsel derived from a hexagram arise not from isolated lines but from the complex interplay of all six lines in their specific positions and relationships.²⁰ Each line—whether Yin or Yang, stable or changing—contributes to the holistic picture of the situation, demonstrating interdependence within the symbolic architecture.²³ The interpretation considers the position of the line (bottom to top), its nature, and its relationship to neighboring lines and the hexagram as a whole.

Furthermore, the sequence in which the 64 hexagrams are traditionally arranged, such as the King Wen sequence, implies a connection between situations, suggesting a flow where one state naturally leads to or influences the next.² Interpretive practice sometimes involves considering the hexagrams that precede and follow the primary one in the sequence to gain broader context.

This structural interdependence mirrors the I Ching‘s broader cosmological view of the universe as an interconnected web.²⁷ Forces and realms are not isolated; Heaven, Earth, and Humanity are seen as mutually influencing participants in a single, unified cosmic process.²³ The hexagram, with its interwoven lines reflecting these realms, acts as a microcosm of this universal interconnectedness.

D. Guidance through Interpretation

The I Ching functions primarily as a wisdom text and a guide for consultation, rather than simply a tool for deterministic fortune-telling.¹ It offers a symbolic system for self-reflection, ethical deliberation, and understanding the complex dynamics of situations, particularly in times of uncertainty or transition.⁶ The process of consultation, often involving ritualized methods like coin or yarrow stalk casting ¹, is intended to help the individual access insights into the underlying patterns governing their circumstances.

The textual components associated with each hexagram provide layered guidance. The Judgment offers an overall assessment of the situation’s nature and potential, often giving concise advice.¹ The individual Line Statements provide more specific counsel related to particular aspects or stages of the situation, corresponding to the line’s position within the hexagram.¹ When changing lines appear, their specific texts, along with the resulting secondary hexagram, offer direction on how to manage the inherent transformation.⁶

The ultimate goal of interpreting the I Ching is to gain clarity about the present configuration of Yin and Yang forces, recognize the potential and direction of change, and align one’s attitude and actions with the perceived flow of the Dao (the Way or natural cosmic order).²¹ By understanding the situation’s underlying pattern and acting in accordance with its inherent rhythm, the individual seeks to foster auspicious outcomes, avoid misfortune, and conduct themselves meaningfully and responsibly.² This process necessitates active engagement and interpretation by the inquirer, fostering situational awareness and informed choice.²²

The I Ching thus presents a sophisticated model where reality’s structure (hexagrams, lines) and its inherent process (change, cycles) are fundamentally intertwined. The symbolic structure itself is designed to map and illuminate dynamic processes. The hexagram is not merely a static snapshot but a field pregnant with potential for transformation, activated and revealed through the mechanism of changing lines. This suggests a worldview where stability and flux are not opposing forces but integrated phases within a continuous cosmic unfolding. Consequently, understanding the potential for change inherent within any given structure or situation becomes paramount for navigating reality effectively. The guidance offered functions through pattern recognition and heightened situational awareness. By consulting the text, the individual seeks to identify the archetypal pattern ⁷ relevant to their current circumstances within the larger cosmic context.⁶ The advice provided then suggests appropriate responses based on this pattern and its potential trajectory, empowering the individual to make informed choices and act skillfully within the unfolding situation.⁶ This approach moves beyond simple prediction, positioning the I Ching as a tool for strategic and ethical navigation, enhancing the user’s capacity to perceive dynamics and choose actions aligned with cosmic rhythms.

III. The Lotus Sutra: Unveiling the One Vehicle

A. Structure and Narrative Flow: Revealing the Dharma

The Lotus Sutra, in its most influential form based on Kumārajīva’s 5th-century CE Chinese translation ¹⁰, is organized into 28 chapters. Scholarly analysis suggests the text evolved over time, with chapters 2 through 9 likely representing the earliest core ¹⁷, while later chapters elaborate on themes like the Bodhisattva path and the nature of Buddhahood. Traditional East Asian interpretations often divide the Sutra into two halves: the first 14 chapters constituting the “Theoretical Teaching” (or “Trace Gate,” focusing on skillful means and the revelation of the One Vehicle) and the latter 14 chapters comprising the “Essential Teaching” (or “Origin Gate,” revealing the Buddha’s eternal nature).¹⁰ Key chapters include Chapter 2 (“Skillful Means”), Chapter 3 (“A Parable”), Chapter 11 (“Appearance of the Jeweled Stupa”), Chapter 12 (“Devadatta”), Chapter 16 (“The Life Span of the Thus Come One”), and Chapter 25 (“The Universal Gateway of Avalokiteśvara Bodhisattva”).⁹

The Sutra characteristically blends prose narrative with verse (gāthā), where the poetic sections often repeat, reinforce, or possibly predate the prose content.⁹ A defining feature is its extensive use of parables and allegories.⁹ These narratives—such as the famous Parable of the Burning House ¹⁵, the Parable of the Poor Son (or Prodigal Son) ¹⁷, the Parable of the Medicinal Herbs ¹⁷, the Parable of the Phantom City ¹⁵, and the Parable of the Hidden Jewel ¹⁷—serve as primary pedagogical tools. They translate complex Mahāyāna doctrines into accessible, relatable, and often dramatic scenarios, functioning as powerful expressions of the Buddha’s wisdom and compassion aimed at guiding beings toward understanding.¹⁶

The overall structure of the Lotus Sutra embodies a process of progressive revelation.⁹ The narrative unfolds gradually, leading the audience from initially presented, provisional teachings towards the ultimate and unifying truths of the Mahāyāna path, culminating in the doctrines of the One Vehicle and the eternal nature of the Buddha.¹⁷ This layered unveiling is itself an enactment of the principle of skillful means.

B. Core Doctrines: The Mahāyāna Vision

Central to the Lotus Sutra is the doctrine of the One Vehicle (Ekayāna).⁹ This teaching proclaims that, ultimately, there is only a single path leading to supreme enlightenment, the path to full Buddhahood. The previously taught paths—those of the Śrāvaka (voice-hearer, aiming for Arhatship), the Pratyekabuddha (solitary realizer), and the Bodhisattva (seeking Buddhahood for all beings)—are revealed not as separate final destinations but as “skillful means” (upāya) employed by the Buddha to guide beings of different capacities toward this one, universal goal.⁹ The One Vehicle is synonymous with the Mahāyāna path, emphasizing universal liberation and inclusivity.¹⁵

A second pivotal revelation, primarily in Chapter 16 (“The Life Span of the Thus Come One”), concerns the Eternal Buddha.¹⁵ The Sutra declares that Shakyamuni Buddha’s historical birth, enlightenment under the Bodhi tree, and apparent death (parinirvāṇa) were merely appearances, skillful displays enacted for the benefit of beings. In reality, the Buddha attained enlightenment countless eons ago, and his lifespan is immeasurable; he remains eternally present and active in the cosmos, continually working for the salvation of all beings.¹⁵ This radically reframes Buddhahood from a singular past event to an ongoing, timeless reality and presence.

Implicitly underpinning the universality of the One Vehicle is the concept of Universal Buddha-nature (Tathāgatagarbha). Although the term itself may not be central in the Lotus Sutra compared to other texts, the Sutra strongly implies that all sentient beings possess the inherent potential to attain Buddhahood.⁹ This potential is illustrated vividly through narratives like the Parable of the Hidden Jewel (a priceless gem unknowingly possessed) ¹⁷, the story of the Dragon King’s daughter achieving instantaneous enlightenment despite perceived limitations ¹⁷, and the account of Bodhisattva Never Disparaging, who revered everyone he met as a future Buddha.¹⁵ This inherent potential is the basis upon which the promise of universal Buddhahood rests.

C. The Philosophy of Transformation: The Path to Buddhahood

The narrative arc of the Lotus Sutra fundamentally depicts a process of spiritual transformation. It charts the journey of disciples—and by extension, the reader—from limited understanding, attachment to provisional goals (such as individual Arhatship), and even disbelief, towards the expansive vision of the Mahāyāna: the aspiration for universal enlightenment (bodhicitta) and the realization of their own potential for Buddhahood.⁹ The parables serve as milestones in this transformation, illustrating the overcoming of delusion (the children in the burning house ¹⁷), the recognition of innate potential (the poor son finding his father ¹⁷), and the acceptance of the ultimate goal (receiving the great white ox cart ¹⁷).

This transformation is facilitated through faith and practice. The Sutra emphasizes the importance of faith in its teachings as a powerful catalyst for understanding and progress.⁹ Specific practices associated with the Lotus Sutra, particularly in East Asian traditions, include chanting its title or passages ¹⁵, reading, reciting, copying, and expounding the Sutra ⁴⁸, and actively embodying the compassionate path of the Bodhisattva, working for the welfare of others.¹⁵

The process of transformation depicted incorporates both gradual and sudden elements. While parables like that of the poor son illustrate a long, gradual process of development and maturation under the Buddha’s guidance ¹⁷, other episodes, such as the Dragon King’s daughter attaining Buddhahood instantly ¹⁷, and the doctrine that realizing one’s inherent Buddha-nature can lead to immediate attainment ³⁵, suggest the possibility of sudden breakthroughs and transformations.⁵¹

D. Interdependence in Mahāyāna Thought

The worldview presented in the Lotus Sutra is deeply rooted in the fundamental Buddhist principle of Dependent Origination (Pratītyasamutpāda).¹⁹ This doctrine posits that all phenomena, mental and physical, arise not independently but in intricate webs of mutual dependence on causes and conditions. Nothing possesses a fixed, inherent, unchanging self-nature (svabhāva). This lack of inherent existence is the meaning of emptiness (śūnyatā), a core Mahāyāna insight that permeates the Sutra’s understanding of reality.¹⁹

Within this framework of interdependence, the doctrine of the Ten Suchnesses (Jūnyoze / Shi Rushi), while elaborated most fully by the Tiantai school based on a passage in Chapter 2, provides a detailed analytical lens.¹⁷ These ten factors are: Appearance (outward form/behavior), Nature (inherent disposition), Entity (substance integrating appearance and nature), Power (potential energy), Influence (function/action when potential is activated), Internal Cause (primary cause producing like effect), Relation (secondary causes/conditions enabling the primary cause), Latent Effect (dormant result of cause and conditions), Manifest Effect (tangible result emerging over time), and Consistency from Beginning to End (the unifying principle ensuring all nine aspects are coherently interrelated in any given moment).³⁴ The Ten Suchnesses function to reveal the “ultimate reality” or “true mark” of any phenomenon (dharma) by analyzing its multifaceted constitution and causal dynamics within the present moment.³⁴

This framework powerfully underscores the interconnected nature of reality. The tenth factor, “Consistency from beginning to end,” explicitly highlights the coherence and interrelatedness of all aspects of existence.³⁴ Developed further by Tiantai masters like Zhiyi, this led to profound doctrines such as “three thousand realms in a single moment of thought” (ichinen sanzen), which posits that the entirety of reality, in all its potential states (the Ten Worlds or Realms, mutually containing each other), is fully present and accessible within each moment of consciousness, characterized by the Ten Suchnesses.³⁴ This illustrates a radical vision of ontological interdependence.

E. Guidance through Skillful Means (Upāya)

A defining characteristic of the Lotus Sutra‘s approach to guidance and the transmission of wisdom is the concept of Skillful Means (Upāya).⁹ Known in Chinese as fangbian and Japanese as hōben, Upāya refers to the Buddha’s compassionate and wise pedagogical strategies, his ability to adapt teachings and methods to suit the specific capacities, inclinations, needs, and circumstances of diverse sentient beings.⁵⁰ The ultimate purpose of employing Upāya is the liberation and awakening of all beings.⁵⁰

Upāya manifests in various ways throughout the Sutra. The teaching of the Three Vehicles (Śrāvaka, Pratyekabuddha, Bodhisattva) is presented as a provisional strategy, an expedient means to attract beings to the Dharma before revealing the ultimate truth of the One Vehicle.⁹ The numerous parables are themselves examples of Upāya, using relatable narratives to convey profound truths that might otherwise be inaccessible.¹⁷ The Buddha’s apparent parinirvāṇa is also revealed as an Upāya, a skillful device to prevent complacency and encourage diligent practice among his followers.¹⁷ Upāya thus accounts for the seeming diversity and even contradictions within Buddhist teachings, framing them as context-dependent applications of wisdom aimed at a single goal.⁵⁰

While the concept could potentially be misinterpreted as justifying any means for a desired end, Mahāyāna ethics emphasizes that true Upāya must always be grounded in wisdom (prajñā) and great compassion (mahākaruṇā).⁵⁰ It is not about deception for its own sake, but about effective, empathetic communication and meeting beings where they are on their path to understanding.⁵⁰

The Lotus Sutra‘s narrative and parabolic structure functions as more than mere illustration; it is a performative enactment of skillful means. The text aims not just for intellectual assent but for an emotional and volitional transformation in the reader or listener.⁹ By presenting wondrous events like the emergence of the Jeweled Stupa ¹⁵ and relatable human struggles like that of the poor son ¹⁷, the Sutra engages the audience on multiple levels. The narrative structure itself guides the reader through stages of unfolding understanding, mirroring the pedagogical process it describes. Thus, the medium—richly symbolic, narrative, and parabolic—is inseparable from the message of the One Vehicle revealed through Upāya. Furthermore, the doctrine of the Ten Suchnesses provides a crucial philosophical framework for understanding the immanence of ultimate reality within every fleeting phenomenon.³⁴ By analyzing any moment or object through these ten facets—encompassing its appearance, function, and effects alongside its inherent nature, causes, and conditions—one perceives the simultaneous truth of conventional reality and ultimate emptiness/interdependence. The tenth Suchness, “Consistency from beginning to end,” binds these aspects, showing how the ultimate nature of reality is expressed through the particularities of the conventional world. This provides a robust basis for the Mahāyāna affirmation of engaging with the mundane world (the sāha world of suffering) as the very field for cultivating the Bodhisattva path.¹⁹ Enlightenment is thus understood not merely as an escape from the world, but as a profound realization of its true, interdependent nature, revealed moment by moment.

IV. Comparative Analysis: Core Themes

A. Transformation

Both the I Ching and the Lotus Sutra are deeply concerned with transformation, yet their focus differs significantly, reflecting the distinct orientations of their respective traditions.

The I Ching centers on understanding and navigating situational transformation.² Change is depicted as an inherent, cyclical process driven by the dynamic interplay of Yin and Yang forces. The hexagrams map various configurations of these forces, representing archetypal situations.⁷ The changing lines are crucial indicators, pinpointing the locus of instability and the direction of potential shifts from one state to another.⁶ The guidance offered aims at pragmatic adaptation—understanding the current phase of the cycle, anticipating developments, and choosing actions that align with the cosmic flow to achieve harmony, balance, and auspicious outcomes within the ongoing process of change.⁸ The transformation sought is primarily adaptive and situational.

The Lotus Sutra, in contrast, emphasizes spiritual transformation.⁹ It narrates a progressive journey from states of ignorance, limited aspiration (e.g., seeking only personal liberation), and attachment to provisional views, towards the attainment of full Buddhahood—a state of perfect wisdom and universal compassion. This transformation involves fundamental shifts in understanding (realizing the truth of the One Vehicle, the eternal Buddha, and one’s own Buddha-nature), motivation (developing bodhicitta, the aspiration for the enlightenment of all beings), and engagement in specific practices (faith, chanting, Bodhisattva deeds).⁹ The parables vividly illustrate stages of this inner metamorphosis, depicting the overcoming of delusion and the gradual or sometimes sudden realization of ultimate potential.¹⁷ The transformation aimed for is soteriological and ontological.

Comparing the two, both texts present reality as inherently dynamic. However, the I Ching provides a framework for understanding and managing change primarily within the phenomenal world, focusing on external situations and advising skillful adaptation to cosmic rhythms. The Lotus Sutra charts a path of internal change, a spiritual evolution aimed at transcending the limitations of ordinary existence (or realizing its true nature) to achieve an ultimate state of being. One offers wisdom for navigating the cycles of change; the other offers a path toward liberation from, or profound recontextualization of, those cycles. This difference reflects the distinct ultimate concerns of the traditions from which they arise: the Confucian and Daoist emphasis on achieving harmony and fulfilling one’s potential within the natural and social order, versus the Buddhist focus on liberation from suffering (dukkha) and the cycle of rebirth (samsara), which in Mahāyāna involves realizing Buddhahood for the benefit of all beings within that very cycle.⁵ The type of transformation sought dictates the nature of the map provided: the I Ching maps the existing terrain of cosmic change for navigation, while the Lotus Sutra maps a journey towards a different state of being, using the existing terrain as the context.

B. Interdependence

The concept of interdependence is fundamental to both systems, but it is conceptualized and emphasized differently.

In the I Ching, interdependence is primarily structural and systemic. It is evident in the way the meaning of a hexagram emerges from the configuration and interplay of its six constituent lines.²⁰ The dynamic balance and mutual influence of Yin and Yang forces are the bedrock of its cosmology.⁴ The sequential arrangement of hexagrams suggests a causal or developmental link between different states or situations.² Furthermore, the I Ching operates on a principle of correspondence, linking human affairs with cosmic patterns and the interplay of Heaven and Earth.²³ Interdependence here is about the relationship between parts within a dynamic system and the correlation between different levels of reality.

In the Lotus Sutra and the Mahāyāna tradition it represents, interdependence is understood primarily in ontological and ethical terms. It is grounded in the core Buddhist doctrine of Dependent Origination (pratītyasamutpāda), which asserts that all phenomena lack inherent, independent existence (svabhāva) and arise solely in dependence upon a web of causes and conditions.¹⁹ This is the basis of the concept of emptiness (śūnyatā).¹⁹ The Ten Suchnesses provide a detailed framework for analyzing this moment-to-moment interdependence, showing how appearance, nature, function, causality, and effect are all intrinsically linked within any given dharma.³⁴ Crucially, the doctrine of universal Buddha-nature posits a shared, fundamental potential linking all sentient beings.¹⁵ This ontological interdependence—the lack of ultimate separation between beings and phenomena—forms the philosophical basis for Mahāyāna ethics, particularly the boundless compassion (karuṇā) and altruistic commitment of the Bodhisattva ideal.⁴⁵

Comparing these perspectives, the I Ching illuminates how components function and relate within a changing system, emphasizing correlation and systemic balance. The Lotus Sutra, drawing on broader Buddhist thought, reveals the fundamental lack of inherent separation between entities and underscores a shared potential that transcends individual differences. The interdependence described in the I Ching primarily informs strategic action and alignment with cosmic forces. The interdependence central to the Lotus Sutra grounds ethical commitment, compassion, and the very understanding of the nature of reality as empty yet interconnected.

C. Guidance and Wisdom

Both texts serve as profound sources of guidance and wisdom, but their methods and the nature of the wisdom imparted differ significantly.

The I Ching offers guidance primarily through the interpretation of symbolic patterns.⁶ Through divination methods, a specific hexagram and potentially changing lines are identified, representing the inquirer’s current situation.²² The associated texts—Judgments and Line Statements—provide situational analysis, ethical counsel, and advice on the most appropriate or auspicious course of action.¹ Wisdom in the context of the I Ching involves developing the capacity to recognize the patterns of change, understand the interplay of forces (Yin/Yang) in a given situation, and act in timely and harmonious ways that align with the Dao.⁶ The process requires active interpretation and reflection on the part of the user, who must relate the symbolic language to their specific circumstances.²²

The Lotus Sutra presents guidance as flowing primarily from the skillful means (Upāya) employed by the enlightened Buddha.⁹ The teachings, including the parables and the progressive revelation of doctrines like the One Vehicle and the Eternal Buddha, are understood as compassionate strategies adapted to the varying capacities and needs of listeners.⁹ The Buddha is portrayed as the ultimate guide, possessing perfect wisdom and compassion, who adjusts his message to lead all beings effectively towards the truth. Wisdom, in this context, involves ultimately realizing the profound truths revealed in the Sutra—the reality of the One Vehicle, the emptiness of phenomena, the universality of Buddha-nature, and the eternal presence of Buddhahood.⁹ Faith in the Buddha and the Sutra’s teachings is often presented as a crucial element in receiving this guidance and progressing on the path.⁹

Comparing the modes of guidance, the I Ching empowers the individual inquirer to discern meaning from cosmic patterns and apply it to their situation; it fosters interpretive skill and adaptive intelligence. The Lotus Sutra emphasizes the role of the enlightened teacher (the Buddha) who employs diverse, adaptable methods (Upāya) to communicate a universal truth that might otherwise be inaccessible due to the listener’s delusions or limited capacity. The I Ching offers a tool for navigating the complexities of the world; the Lotus Sutra presents a path revealed by an ultimate guide, leading towards liberation and supreme awakening. This contrast points towards different underlying assumptions about how wisdom is accessed. The I Ching tradition suggests a greater potential for humans to directly perceive and align with cosmic order through observation and interpretation.¹ Mahāyāna Buddhism, as represented in the Lotus Sutra, often highlights the depth of ordinary ignorance (avidya) and the indispensable role of the Buddha’s compassionate intervention and skillful pedagogy in illuminating the path to truth.⁹ This difference could shape how practitioners in each tradition view learning, authority, and the capacity for unaided insight.

V. Structural Resonances: Symbolism and Dynamics

A. Hexagrams as Archetypes, Parables as Scenarios

A compelling area of comparison lies in the primary symbolic units employed by each text: the hexagrams of the I Ching and the parables of the Lotus Sutra.

The 64 hexagrams of the I Ching function as archetypal patterns representing fundamental configurations of energy and situational dynamics within the cosmos and human experience.¹ They constitute a comprehensive symbolic taxonomy, mapping the spectrum of possible states arising from the interplay of Yin and Yang.¹ Each hexagram encapsulates a core principle or process—such as Creativity (Hexagram 1), Receptivity (Hexagram 2), Difficulty at the Beginning (Hexagram 3), or Conflict (Hexagram 6) ⁷—offering a condensed symbolic representation of a universal situation or phase.

The parables of the Lotus Sutra, conversely, function as illustrative scenarios or narrative enactments.⁹ Rather than static patterns, they are dynamic stories with characters, settings, and plots, designed to make abstract doctrinal points concrete and accessible.¹⁶ For example, the Parable of the Burning House dramatizes the perils of samsaric existence and the Buddha’s use of Upāya to rescue beings ¹⁵; the Parable of the Poor Son illustrates the tragedy of unrecognized inherent potential (Buddha-nature) and the patient guidance required for its realization.¹⁶ These narratives depict processes of misunderstanding, skillful intervention, gradual awakening, and ultimate reconciliation.

Comparing them, both hexagrams and parables serve to translate vast, complex realities into interpretable symbolic forms. However, hexagrams offer abstract, structural maps of energetic configurations, relatively static until activated by changing lines. Parables provide dynamic, narrative illustrations of spiritual principles and processes in action. While hexagrams map the underlying forces and potential within a situation, parables depict the unfolding drama of spiritual development and the application of Dharma. One might conceptualize the hexagrams as representing the underlying ‘energetic signature’ or archetypal field upon which the scenarios depicted in the parables play out. Both methods represent a form of symbolic compression, reducing overwhelming complexity—be it the totality of situational possibilities or the intricacies of the path to enlightenment—into manageable units for contemplation and understanding.¹⁵ This shared strategy highlights a fundamental aspect of wisdom traditions: the necessity of creating symbolic models or maps to orient individuals within realities that exceed direct empirical grasp or simple linear description. The power of these symbols lies in their capacity to resonate archetypally or vividly illustrate core principles.

B. Changing Lines and the Ten Suchnesses: Dynamics of Reality

Further resonance can be explored by comparing the dynamic elements within each system: the changing lines of the I Ching and the Ten Suchnesses doctrine associated with the Lotus Sutra (particularly in Tiantai interpretation).

Changing lines in the I Ching specifically indicate the locus and vector of imminent transformation within a hexagrammatic situation.⁶ They signify that a particular aspect (represented by the line’s position) is in flux, transitioning from Yin to Yang or vice versa, and thus propelling the overall situation towards the state represented by the resultant hexagram.⁶ They embody the dynamism inherent within apparent stability and provide guidance focused on managing this transition.²⁰

The Ten Suchnesses, as articulated based on Chapter 2 of the Lotus Sutra, offer a detailed analysis of the multifaceted reality of any phenomenon (dharma) as it exists in a specific moment.³⁴ They describe the simultaneous presence of its Appearance, Nature, Entity, Power (potential), Influence (function), Internal Cause, Relation (conditions), Latent Effect, Manifest Effect, and their unifying Consistency.³⁴ This framework reveals the intricate, interdependent “suchness” or true nature of the phenomenon, encompassing both its static attributes and its dynamic potential and causal basis within that instant.³⁴

Comparing these two concepts reveals a fascinating complementarity in how they approach dynamics. Changing lines emphasize temporal transition—the movement between distinct states or hexagrams. They highlight the diachronic aspect of change. The Ten Suchnesses, conversely, emphasize the synchronic complexity and interdependence within a single state or moment. They reveal the intricate constitution and inner workings—the potential, function, causes, and conditions—that define that state’s reality. While a changing line signals that a transformation is occurring and where its impetus lies, the Ten Suchnesses provide a framework for analyzing the fundamental nature of the state undergoing change, as well as the nature of the change process itself. For instance, one could theoretically apply the Ten Suchnesses to analyze the “Power,” “Influence,” “Internal Cause,” and “Relation” involved in the transformation indicated by a specific changing line. The I Ching points to when and where change is potent; the Ten Suchnesses analyze the intrinsic nature and interconnected factors of the situation at that potent juncture. Used together conceptually, the I Ching could identify the critical moment of shift, while the Ten Suchnesses could offer a deeper diagnostic tool to understand the underlying dynamics contributing to that shift and its potential unfolding, thereby enriching the interpretation beyond traditional commentaries.

C. Comparative Overview Table

To consolidate the key distinctions and parallels discussed, the following table summarizes the comparison between the I Ching and the Lotus Sutra across several core dimensions:

Feature	I Ching (Yijing)	Lotus Sutra (Saddharmapuṇḍarīka-sūtra)
Core Symbolic Unit	64 Hexagrams (combinations of 6 Yin/Yang lines) 4	Chapters (28), utilizing Narrative and Parables 9
Dynamic Element	Changing Lines (indicate transformation between hexagrams) 6	Skillful Means (Upāya), Ten Suchnesses (analyze momentary reality) 17
Core Cosmology	Cyclical Change, Interplay of Yin & Yang, Dao, Heaven-Earth-Humanity Correlation 2	Dependent Origination (Pratītyasamutpāda), Emptiness (Śūnyatā), Buddha-nature, Eternal Buddha 15
Mode of Guidance	Interpretation of hexagrams/lines obtained via divination; situational advice 22	Revelation through Buddha’s teachings, adapted via Skillful Means (Upāya); faith & practice 9
Primary Goal	Harmony with Dao, auspicious action, ethical conduct within cosmic cycles 8	Attainment of Buddhahood (universal enlightenment), liberation from suffering 9
Focus of Interdependence	Systemic (lines in hexagram, Yin/Yang), Cosmic Correlation 20	Ontological (Emptiness, Dependent Origination), Ethical (Compassion), Universal Potential 19
Focus of Transformation	Situational, adaptive change within the world 6	Spiritual, soteriological change towards enlightenment 9

VI. Scholarly Intersections and Interpretations

A. Historical Interactions and Interpretations

The comparison between the I Ching and the Lotus Sutra is not merely a modern academic exercise; it is situated within a long history of interaction and mutual influence between Buddhism and indigenous Chinese thought systems.¹ When Buddhism entered China around the first century CE, it encountered a sophisticated cultural landscape already shaped by Confucianism, Daoism, and the cosmological framework often associated with the I Ching and Yin-Yang theories. This encounter inevitably led to processes of translation, adaptation, and syncretism.

The development of distinctively Chinese forms of Buddhism, most notably Chan (Zen), clearly shows the imprint of Daoist concepts and sensibilities, such as emphasis on naturalness, spontaneity, and direct experience.⁶⁶ Furthermore, Buddhist thinkers themselves engaged directly with the I Ching. A prominent example is Chih-hsu Ou-i (Zhixu Ouyi, 1599–1655), a revered master of the Tiantai school, which holds the Lotus Sutra as its central text. Ou-i authored a significant commentary on the I Ching, titled Zhouyi Chanjie (Chan Interpretation of the Zhou Changes), wherein he systematically interpreted the hexagrams and their transformations through the lens of Buddhist philosophy, particularly Tiantai doctrines like the Threefold Truth (emptiness, provisional existence, the Middle Way), causality, and the different levels of realization.⁷² Ou-i’s work demonstrates a conscious effort by a major Buddhist figure to find deep resonance and integrate the wisdom of the I Ching with Mahāyāna principles.

In a related vein, some scholars suggest that the elaboration of certain Mahāyāna concepts in China, such as the Hua-yen school’s understanding of “dynamic Suchness” (the Absolute, Tathatā, as both unchanging and responsive to conditions), may have drawn upon or found parallels in indigenous modes of thought derived from the I Ching or Daoism, particularly concepts relating to the interplay of the unchanging principle (li) and changing phenomena (shi), or the Daoist idea of wu-wei (effortless action).⁶⁸ These historical intersections underscore that the dialogue between these traditions has been ongoing for centuries, suggesting a perceived compatibility or complementarity recognized by practitioners and thinkers in the past. This historical context provides a rich background and validation for contemporary comparative inquiry.

B. Modern Scholarly Comparisons

Contemporary scholarship continues to explore the intersections between these traditions. Comparative studies often examine Daoism and Mahāyāna Buddhism in relation to their views on ultimate reality, change, and ethics.⁵³ These comparisons frequently highlight both convergences and divergences. For instance, the Daoist concept of Dao as the ultimate principle and source is compared with Buddhist notions of Emptiness (Śūnyatā) or Suchness (Tathatā).⁵³ While both point towards a reality transcending simple description, Śūnyatā specifically emphasizes the lack of inherent existence in phenomena arising through dependent origination, whereas the Dao often implies an underlying natural order or flow.⁵³ Similarly, Daoist wu-wei (effortless action, non-striving) ⁶⁶ is often contrasted with Buddhist ethical frameworks involving precepts, compassion, and skillful means aimed at liberation.⁵⁴ Points of resonance are often found in themes of non-attachment, letting go, and the importance of aligning with reality’s flow ⁶⁶, while differences emerge in ultimate goals (harmony within nature vs. liberation/Buddhahood) and views of the self.⁶⁵

Specific scholars have contributed relevant insights. Joseph A. Adler’s work on Zhu Xi, the great synthesizer of Neo-Confucianism, illuminates how the I Ching was integrated into a sophisticated philosophical system that itself engaged critically with Buddhist and Daoist ideas.⁷⁸ Zhu Xi’s synthesis, while distinctly Confucian, demonstrates the centrality of the I Ching‘s worldview in later Chinese thought that was in direct dialogue with Buddhism.⁷⁸ Gene Reeves, known for his contemporary translation and interpretation of the Lotus Sutra, has explored its philosophy of integration and becoming, often drawing parallels with process philosophy.¹⁹ His emphasis on the Sutra’s affirmation of the mundane world, interdependence (pratītyasamutpāda), and the harmony of diverse elements offers potential points of connection with the I Ching‘s focus on navigating change within the empirical world.¹⁹ Whalen Lai’s research connecting Hua-yen Buddhist philosophy (particularly Fa-tsang’s dynamic Suchness) with potential influences from I Ching thought further reinforces the historical cross-fertilization.⁶⁸

These scholarly endeavors consistently reveal that while surface similarities in terminology or concepts (like “emptiness” or “non-action”) exist, a nuanced comparison requires careful attention to how these concepts function within the distinct philosophical architecture and ultimate aims of each tradition. The value of comparison lies not in erasing differences but in appreciating the unique ways each system addresses shared human concerns about reality, change, and ethical living, recognizing both the resonance and the divergence.

VII. Synthesis: Complementary Insights for Contemporary Practice

A. Enriching Spiritual and Ethical Reflection

The distinct perspectives offered by the I Ching and the Lotus Sutra can provide complementary insights for contemporary spiritual and ethical reflection. The I Ching‘s focus on understanding and navigating immediate, situational change offers a practical toolkit for dealing with the complexities and uncertainties of daily life.⁶ Its emphasis on recognizing patterns, assessing the balance of forces (Yin/Yang), and choosing timely, appropriate action fosters adaptability and strategic awareness. This can complement the Lotus Sutra‘s broader, long-term vision focused on spiritual transformation, the cultivation of wisdom and compassion, and the ultimate goal of enlightenment.⁹ While the I Ching provides tactical wisdom for specific junctures, the Lotus Sutra offers the overarching strategic vision and ethical grounding.

Similarly, the concept of interdependence is illuminated from different angles. The I Ching‘s systemic view—demonstrating how lines interact within a hexagram and how human affairs correlate with cosmic cycles ²⁰—can provide tangible models for grasping the more abstract Mahāyāna principles of dependent origination and the interconnectedness of all beings.¹⁹ Seeing how small changes in one part of the I Ching‘s symbolic system affect the whole can offer a concrete analogy for understanding the ripple effects of actions emphasized in Buddhist karma theory and the profound unity implied by universal Buddha-nature.¹⁷

Furthermore, the contrasting approaches to guidance can be mutually enriching. The I Ching‘s requirement for active interpretation and self-reflection in discerning the meaning of a situation ⁸ can cultivate a deeper appreciation for context and individual capacity. This heightened awareness can, in turn, inform the understanding and application of the Buddhist concept of skillful means (Upāya).⁵⁰ Recognizing the specific dynamics of a situation (perhaps aided by I Ching contemplation) could lead to a more nuanced and effective application of Upāya, whether in offering guidance to others or in discerning the appropriate teaching for oneself. Indeed, for certain individuals, the very practice of consulting the I Ching might function as a form of Upāya, a skillful means tailored to their cognitive style for accessing deeper insights.³¹

B. Potential Synergies and Practical Applications

Beyond conceptual enrichment, potential synergies exist for integrating insights from both texts into contemporary practice.

1. Ethical Decision-Making: The I Ching can serve as a tool for analyzing the dynamics of specific ethical dilemmas or life choices, helping to clarify the forces at play and potential outcomes of different actions.⁶ This diagnostic function can be grounded within the broader ethical framework of Mahāyāna Buddhism derived from the Lotus Sutra, ensuring that choices are guided not just by situational pragmatism but by compassion, non-harming, the aspiration for universal well-being (Bodhisattva ideal), and respect for the inherent Buddha-nature in all involved parties.⁶⁷ The I Ching helps understand the ‘what is’ and ‘what might be,’ while the Lotus Sutra informs the ‘why’ and ‘how’ of acting ethically within that context.
2. Understanding Processes of Change: The hexagrams, particularly when involving changing lines, offer a powerful visual and symbolic language for contemplating processes of transformation, both external and internal.³¹ One might use the sequence of hexagrams or the transition between a primary and resultant hexagram as a meditative focus to understand personal spiritual development, mapping stages of insight or challenge onto the I Ching‘s archetypal patterns, or vice versa. This could provide a structured way to reflect on the unfolding nature of practice and life events.
3. Integrating Perspectives on Reality: The two texts can be seen as offering complementary perspectives on the nature of reality, aligning with the Mahāyāna Two Truths doctrine. The I Ching can be viewed as providing profound insights into the ‘conventional truth’ (saṃvṛti-satya)—the functional reality of situations, causes, conditions, and change within the phenomenal world. The Lotus Sutra, particularly its teachings on emptiness, the eternal Buddha, and the One Vehicle, illuminates the ‘ultimate truth’ (paramārtha-satya).³⁵ The Ten Suchnesses doctrine, bridging appearance and nature, function and causality, could serve as a conceptual link, analyzing the conventional reality described by the I Ching in light of the ultimate interdependence and potential revealed by the Lotus Sutra.³⁴
4. Drawing on Integrated Traditions: Individuals seeking practical integration can look to historical precedents like Chih-hsu Ou-i’s Buddhist I Ching ⁷² or contemporary adaptations that blend divination with spiritual or psychological frameworks ⁸⁴ as potential models for developing a personalized practice that draws wisdom from both streams.

The true synergy perhaps lies in leveraging the I Ching‘s diagnostic power for situational awareness and navigating conventional reality, while allowing the profound ethical and soteriological vision of the Lotus Sutra to guide one’s ultimate intention and purpose. The I Ching can function as a skillful means for understanding the particularities of the present moment, informed and oriented by the universal aspirations and ethical commitments central to Mahāyāna Buddhism. Furthermore, engaging contemplatively with both systems can cultivate qualities essential for navigating modern life. The I Ching, with its relentless focus on change, fosters adaptability, flexibility, and strategic thinking in the face of uncertainty.² The Lotus Sutra, with its expansive view of time, its affirmation of inherent potential even amidst suffering, and its message of hope conveyed through powerful narratives, cultivates resilience, patience, and a deep sense of meaning that transcends immediate circumstances.¹⁵ Together, they offer complementary resources for psychological and spiritual well-being: the I Ching providing tools for tactical adaptation, the Lotus Sutra offering foundational perspective and meaning, both contributing to navigating contemporary challenges with greater wisdom, equanimity, and purpose.

C. Avoiding Forced Syncretism

While exploring resonances and synergies, it is crucial to respect the distinct integrity of each tradition and avoid superficial or forced syncretism. The ultimate goals differ: the I Ching, particularly within Confucian and Daoist contexts, often aims for harmony, balance, and effective action within the natural and social order, aligning with the Dao or Mandate of Heaven.⁵³ The Lotus Sutra aims for liberation from the cycle of suffering and the attainment of supreme Buddhahood for all beings.⁹ Their metaphysical foundations also differ significantly.

Therefore, simplistic equations between key concepts should be avoided. For example, while both traditions speak of “emptiness,” the Daoist concept of wu (often translated as non-being or nothingness, sometimes related to potentiality) does not carry the precise philosophical weight of Buddhist śūnyatā (the lack of inherent existence due to dependent origination).⁵⁴ Similarly, Daoist wu-wei should not be conflated directly with Buddhist ethical concepts like skillful means or compassion, though analogies might be drawn.⁷⁵ The value of the comparison lies in mutual illumination, broadening perspectives, and identifying complementary strengths, not in creating a homogenous blend that obscures the unique insights and aims of each path.

VIII. Conclusion: Enduring Wisdom in Dialogue

This comparative analysis of the I Ching and the Lotus Sutra has revealed both profound resonances and significant divergences between these two foundational texts of East Asian wisdom. Both grapple with the fundamental nature of reality as dynamic and interconnected, employing sophisticated symbolic systems to guide human understanding and action. Key parallels emerge in their shared emphasis on transformation and interdependence, and in their use of complex symbolic structures—the I Ching‘s hexagrams and changing lines, the Lotus Sutra‘s narratives and parables—to convey deep truths. Concepts like the I Ching‘s focus on adaptive change and the Lotus Sutra‘s doctrine of skillful means (Upāya) also show analogous concerns with context-dependent wisdom.

However, crucial distinctions arise from their differing origins and ultimate aims. The I Ching primarily focuses on situational transformation within the cosmic order, offering guidance through interpretation of archetypal patterns to achieve harmony and auspiciousness. Its understanding of interdependence is largely systemic and correlational. The Lotus Sutra, conversely, emphasizes spiritual transformation towards Buddhahood, offering guidance through the Buddha’s skillful means and revealed teachings. Its understanding of interdependence is ontological (rooted in emptiness and dependent origination) and ethical (grounding universal compassion and Buddha-nature).

The value of bringing these distinct systems into dialogue lies not in erasing their differences but in the mutual illumination that comparison provides. Examining the I Ching through the lens of Mahāyāna thought, or vice versa, sharpens our understanding of the unique contributions and underlying assumptions of each. For contemporary practice, this dialogue offers rich possibilities. The I Ching‘s tools for situational analysis and navigating change can complement the Lotus Sutra‘s profound ethical framework and vision of spiritual potential. Together, they provide complementary resources—tactical and strategic, worldly and ultimate—for cultivating wisdom, compassion, adaptability, and resilience in the face of life’s enduring complexities.⁶⁷

Ultimately, both the I Ching and the Lotus Sutra stand as testaments to the enduring human quest to understand the nature of change and find meaning within it.⁶ Their continued relevance across cultures and millennia speaks to the power of their symbolic language and the depth of their insights into the human condition. The ongoing engagement with, and dialogue between, these ancient streams of wisdom promises to continue enriching philosophical inquiry and spiritual practice for generations to come.

Works cited

1. What Is the I Ching? | ChinaFile, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.chinafile.com/library/nyrb-china-archive/what-i-ching
2. The Book of Changes in The Running Grave: Part One – StrikeFans.com, accessed April 20, 2025, https://strikefans.com/the-book-of-changes-in-the-running-grave-part-one/
3. I Ching – Wikipedia, accessed April 20, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Ching
4. Understanding the I Ching Hexagrams: An Insightful Guide, accessed April 20, 2025, https://aiching.app/i-ching-hexagrams/
5. Comments on previous psychological Tai-Chi models: Jun-zi self-cultivation model – Frontiers, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.871274/full
6. Chinese Philosophy of Change (Yijing), accessed April 20, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chinese-change/
7. Understanding I Ching 64 Hexagrams – HEY World, accessed April 20, 2025, https://world.hey.com/jrsg/understanding-i-ching-64-hexagrams-1fd92cd8
8. I Ching Origins – HEY World, accessed April 20, 2025, https://world.hey.com/jrsg/i-ching-origins-f4158c22
9. jamesshields.blogs.bucknell.edu, accessed April 20, 2025, http://jamesshields.blogs.bucknell.edu/files/2012/12/Lotus-Sutra.pdf
10. The Lotus Sutra: Ideas and Values, accessed April 20, 2025, http://buddhism.lib.ntu.edu.tw/FULLTEXT/JR-MAG/mag390605.pdf
11. Mahayana sutras – Wikipedia, accessed April 20, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahayana_sutras
12. Overview of Chinese Commentaries of the Lotus Sutra – thezensite, accessed April 20, 2025, http://www.thezensite.com/ZenTeachings/Translations/Overview_Research_LotusSutra.pdf
13. Mahayana sutras – Encyclopedia of Buddhism, accessed April 20, 2025, https://encyclopediaofbuddhism.org/wiki/Mahayana_sutras
14. ALONG with traditional exhibitions of Western and Japanese art – 東洋哲学研究所, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.totetu.org/assets/media/paper/j031_4.pdf
15. Lotus Sutra : The King of Sutras – Exotic India Art, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.exoticindiaart.com/article/lotus-sutra-the-king-of-sutras/
16. Comparison of Buddhist Parable Between The Sutra of Perfect Enlightenment and The Lotus Sutra – David Publishing Company, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.davidpublisher.com/Public/uploads/Contribute/5fb32cadb4009.pdf
17. Lotus Sutra – Wikipedia, accessed April 20, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lotus_Sutra
18. Key Passages From The Record of the Orally Transmitted Teachings (Part 5), accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.worldtribune.org/2023/key-passages-from-the-record-of-the-orally-transmitted-teachings-part-5/
19. gene reeves DIVINITY IN PROCESS THOUGHT AND THE LOTUS SUTRA – Open Horizons, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.openhorizons.org/uploads/5/9/1/5/5915900/054.pdf
20. The Art of Reading Changing Lines in the I Ching, accessed April 20, 2025, https://aiching.app/i-ching/2023/11/05/the-art-of-reading-changing-lines-in-the-i-ching/
21. Tai Chi as an Outward Manifestation of the I Ching, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.taichifoundation.org/tai-chi-as-an-outward-manifestation-of-the-i-ching/
22. how to use the i ching – an introduction – Wu Wei Wisdom, accessed April 20, 2025, https://wuweiwisdom.com/how-to-use-the-i-ching/
23. Polarity, Relationality, And Interdependence – World Scripture – Andrew Wilson, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.tparents.org/Library/Unification/Books/World-S/WS-02-05.htm
24. Bian (Change): A Perpetual Discourse of I Ching – DigitalCommons@URI, accessed April 20, 2025, https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029&context=com_facpubs
25. I Ching Wilhelm Translation, accessed April 20, 2025, http://www2.unipr.it/~deyoung/I_Ching_Wilhelm_Translation.html
26. The Metaphysics of the I Ching: The Alignment of Heaven, Man and …, accessed April 20, 2025, https://notesfromthedigitalunderground.net/the-metaphysics-of-the-i-ching-the-alignment-of-heaven-man-and-earth/
27. Chinese Philosophy of Change (Yijing), accessed April 20, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/archIves/sum2020/entries/chinese-change/
28. I Ching oracle – Wikiversity, accessed April 20, 2025, https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/I_Ching_oracle
29. I Ching/The Moving Line – Wikibooks, open books for an open world, accessed April 20, 2025, https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/I_Ching/The_Moving_Line
30. ChatGPT on I Ching at Six Levels – IJMRAP, accessed April 20, 2025, http://ijmrap.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/IJMRAP-V5N9P100Y23.pdf
31. I Ching – The Endless Further, accessed April 20, 2025, http://theendlessfurther.uk/tag/i-ching/
32. Book of Changes – Akira Rabelais, accessed April 20, 2025, https://akirarabelais.com/grandmother.html
33. I Ching: Richard Wilhelm Translation – WisdomPortal.com, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.wisdomportal.com/IChing/IChing-Wilhelm.html
34. Ten suchnesses – Wikipedia, accessed April 20, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_suchnesses
35. fivefold comparison | Dictionary of Buddhism | Nichiren Buddhism …, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.nichirenlibrary.org/en/dic/Content/F/47
36. Dogen’s Appropriation of Lotus Sutra Ground and Space – Ancient Dragon Zen Gate, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.ancientdragon.org/2019/02/20/dogens-appropriation-of-lotus-sutra-ground-and-space/
37. Lectures “Lotus Sutra” – Nichiren Buddhist Kannon Temple of Nevada, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.kannon-temple-nevada.org/lectures-on-the-lotus-sutra-by-rev-kana
38. http://www.bdk.or.jp, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.bdk.or.jp/document/dgtl-dl/dBET_T0262_LotusSutra_2007.pdf
39. Lotus Sutra: 10 Key Themes To Inspire – Tibet Dharma, accessed April 20, 2025, https://tibetdharma.com/lotus-sutra-10-key-themes-to-inspire/
40. By Gene Reeves – Lotus Sutra: A Contemporary Translation of a Buddhist Classic (1.2.2009), accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.amazon.com/Gene-Reeves-Contemporary-Translation-Buddhist/dp/B00HTJXVXS
41. Dōgen and the Lotus Sutra | 500 Yojanas, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.500yojanas.org/dogen-and-the-lotus-sutra/
42. DIVINITY IN PROCESS THOUGHT AND THE LOTUS SUTRA, accessed April 20, 2025, http://buddhism.lib.ntu.edu.tw/FULLTEXT/JR-JOCP/jc102754.htm
43. Struggling With Lotus Sutra – Dharma Wheel, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?t=43812
44. “Eternal” Buddha? – Dharma Wheel, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?t=17143
45. Illuminating the Universality of Buddhist Wisdom | Soka Gakkai (global), accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.sokaglobal.org/in-society/initiatives/illuminating-the-universality-of-buddhist-wisdom.html
46. The Ekayana Buddhism of the Lotus Sutra – Dharma Wheel, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?t=10069
47. I’ve been so wrong/pure lands – Page 15 – Dharma Wheel, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?t=27106&start=280
48. On the Four Stages of Faith and the Five Stages of Practice | WND I | Nichiren Buddhism Library, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.nichirenlibrary.org/en/wnd-1/Content/94
49. Practice of the Lotus Sutra? – Dharma Wheel, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?t=13650
50. An Introduction to Skillful Means – Ancient Dragon Zen Gate, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.ancientdragon.org/an-introduction-to-skillful-means/
51. Unique Ethical Insights Gained from Integrating Gradual Practice with Sudden Enlightenment in the Platform Sutra—An Interpretation from the Perspective of Daoism – MDPI, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/8/424
52. DIVINITY IN PROCESS THOUGHT AND THE LOTUS SUTRA, accessed April 20, 2025, http://ccbs.ntu.edu.tw/FULLTEXT/JR-JOCP/jc102754.htm
53. Ultimate reality – Wikipedia, accessed April 20, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_reality
54. Buddhism vs. Taoism – Reddit, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Buddhism/comments/16p2q7/buddhism_vs_taoism/
55. The Lotus Sutra as a Source for Dogen’s Discourse Style – thezensite, accessed April 20, 2025, http://www.thezensite.com/ZenEssays/DogenStudies/The_Lotus_Sutra_as_a_Source.html
56. The Concept of Upaya (方便） in Mahayana Buddhist Philosophy – Nanzan Institute for Religion and Culture, accessed April 20, 2025, https://nirc.nanzan-u.ac.jp/journal/6/article/459/pdf/download
57. What is skillful means (upaya)? – Buddhism for Beginners – Tricycle: The Buddhist Review, accessed April 20, 2025, https://tricycle.org/beginners/buddhism/skillful-means/
58. Skilful means: A concept in Mahayana Buddhism: Second edition – ResearchGate, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292327075_Skilful_means_A_concept_in_Mahayana_Buddhism_Second_edition
59. Skillful Means | San Diego Troubadour, accessed April 20, 2025, https://sandiegotroubadour.com/skillful-means/
60. What exactly is the “doctrine of skillful means” (Upaya)? : r/Buddhism – Reddit, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Buddhism/comments/7rzeqc/what_exactly_is_the_doctrine_of_skillful_means/
61. Upāya: Skillful means – <> Sutta, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.themindingcentre.org/dharmafarer/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/30.8-Upaya-Skillful-means.-piya.pdf
62. Taoism – On the Way, accessed April 20, 2025, https://on-the-way.blog/category/taoism/
63. Daoist Philosophy, accessed April 20, 2025, https://iep.utm.edu/daoismdaoist-philosophy/
64. Daoism – Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed April 20, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/daoism/
65. Comparing Doaism and Mahayana Buddhism – 1016 Words – Bartleby.com, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Comparing-Doaism-and-Mahayana-Buddhism-FKVWME4CDB6A
66. Daoism | Intro to Philosophy Class Notes – Fiveable, accessed April 20, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/intro-philosophy/unit-9/5-daoism/study-guide/3Pmz4thbVVX9UNnE
67. Taoism vs Buddhism: The Profound Tao-Buddha Connection – Taoist Wellness Online, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.taoistwellness.online/blog/taoism-vs-buddhism
68. The I-ching and the Formation of the Hua-yen Philosophy, accessed April 20, 2025, http://buddhism.lib.ntu.edu.tw/FULLTEXT/JR-JOCP/jc26754.htm
69. Daoism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Summer 2020 Edition), accessed April 20, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/archIves/sum2020/entries/daoism/
70. Confucianism, Daoism, Buddhism, and Chinese Popular Religion | Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Asian History, accessed April 20, 2025, https://oxfordre.com/asianhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.001.0001/acrefore-9780190277727-e-126?d=%2F10.1093%2Facrefore%2F9780190277727.001.0001%2Facrefore-9780190277727-e-126&p=emailAEBqqkOwo42io
71. Are there resemblances between Daoism and Buddhism? – Philosophy Stack Exchange, accessed April 20, 2025, https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/89140/are-there-resemblances-between-daoism-and-buddhism
72. The Buddhist I Ching by Chih-hsu Ou-i, Thomas Cleary (Ebook) – Read free for 30 days, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.everand.com/book/770610385/The-Buddhist-I-Ching
73. The Best 10 I-Ching Books – Blinkist, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.blinkist.com/en/content/topics/i-ching-en
74. The I-Ching and the Formation of the Hua-yen Philosophy – Biroco, accessed April 20, 2025, https://biroco.com/yijing/Whalen_Lai-I_Ching_and_Hua-yen.pdf
75. Daoism and Buddhism – ResearchGate, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285485023_Daoism_and_Buddhism
76. Mahāyāna | Journal of Buddhist Ethics – Dickinson Blogs, accessed April 20, 2025, https://blogs.dickinson.edu/buddhistethics/tag/mahayana/
77. Taoism and Buddhism- What’s the difference? – Reddit, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/1fhyk2h/taoism_and_buddhism_whats_the_difference/
78. Synthesis: “The One and the Many” in the Lotus S tra and Zhu Xi – Kenyon College, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religion/Fac/Adler/Writings/Lotus%20and%20Zhu%20Xi.pdf
79. Buy The Original Meaning of the Yijing by Xi Zhu, Joseph Alan Adler (translator) With Free Delivery – Wordery, accessed April 20, 2025, https://wordery.com/the-original-meaning-of-the-yijing-xi-zhu-joseph-alan-adler-translator-9780231216609
80. The Original Meaning of the Yijing: Commentary on the Scripture of Change 9780231549301 – DOKUMEN.PUB, accessed April 20, 2025, https://dokumen.pub/the-original-meaning-of-the-yijing-commentary-on-the-scripture-of-change-9780231549301.html
81. Zhu Xi – Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed April 20, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/zhu-xi/
82. Full article: Book Reviews, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1179/0737769X14Z.00000000015
83. The Lotus Sutra: A Contemporary Translation of a Buddhist Classic – Amazon.com, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.amazon.com/Lotus-Sutra-Contemporary-Translation-Buddhist/dp/0861715713
84. Applying a Buddhist Interpretation to an I Ching Reading – benebell wen, accessed April 20, 2025, https://benebellwen.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/04.04-applying-a-buddhist-interpretation-to-an-i-ching-reading.pdf
85. Tiantai – Wikipedia, accessed April 20, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiantai
86. History of Taoist and Buddhist Mysticism in China – Benebell Wen, accessed April 20, 2025, https://benebellwen.com/2019/01/05/history-of-taoist-and-buddhist-mysticism-in-china/
87. Taoism Beliefs A Guide to Spiritual Practices – Taoist Wellness Online, accessed April 20, 2025, https://www.taoistwellness.online/blog/taoism-beliefs

https://www.patreon.com/posts/cosmic-cycles-of-127727057?utm_medium=clipboard_copy&utm_source=copyLink&utm_campaign=postshare_creator&utm_content=join_link